G.729.1 RTP Payload Format Update: Discontinuous Transmission (DTX) Support
RFC 5459
| Document | Type |
RFC - Proposed Standard
(January 2009; No errata)
Updates RFC 4749
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Aurelien Sollaud | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 | ||
| Replaces | draft-sollaud-avt-rfc4749-dtx-update | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized bibtex | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 5459 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | Cullen Jennings | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
Network Working Group A. Sollaud
Request for Comments: 5459 France Telecom
Updates: 4749 January 2009
Category: Standards Track
G.729.1 RTP Payload Format Update:
Discontinuous Transmission (DTX) Support
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Abstract
This document updates the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) payload
format to be used for the International Telecommunication Union
(ITU-T) Recommendation G.729.1 audio codec. It adds Discontinuous
Transmission (DTX) support to the RFC 4749 specification, in a
backward-compatible way. An updated media type registration is
included for this payload format.
Sollaud Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 5459 G.729.1 DTX Support in RTP January 2009
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ....................................................2
2. Background ......................................................2
3. RTP Header Usage ................................................3
4. Payload Format ..................................................3
5. Payload Format Parameters .......................................4
5.1. Media Type Registration Update .............................4
5.2. Mapping to SDP Parameters ..................................5
5.2.1. DTX Offer-Answer Model Considerations ...............5
5.2.2. DTX Declarative SDP Considerations ..................6
6. Congestion Control ..............................................6
7. Security Considerations .........................................6
8. IANA Considerations .............................................6
9. References ......................................................6
9.1. Normative References .......................................6
9.2. Informative References .....................................7
1. Introduction
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU-T) Recommendation
G.729.1 [ITU-G.729.1] is a scalable and wideband extension of the
Recommendation G.729 [ITU-G.729] audio codec. [RFC4749] specifies
the payload format for packetization of G.729.1-encoded audio signals
into the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) [RFC3550].
Annex C of G.729.1 [ITU-G.729.1-C] adds Discontinuous Transmission
(DTX) support to G.729.1. This document updates the RTP payload
format to allow usage of this Annex.
Only changes or additions to [RFC4749] will be described in the
following sections.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
2. Background
G.729.1 supports Discontinuous Transmission (DTX), a.k.a. "silence
suppression". It means that the coder includes a Voice Activity
Detection (VAD) algorithm to determine if an audio frame contains
silence or actual audio. During silence periods, the coder may
significantly decrease the transmitted bit rate by sending a small
frame called a Silence Insertion Descriptor (SID) and then stop
transmission. The receiver's decoder will generate comfort noise
(CNG) according to the parameters contained in the SID. This DTX/CNG
scheme is specified in [ITU-G.729.1-C].
Sollaud Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 5459 G.729.1 DTX Support in RTP January 2009
The G.729.1 SID has an embedded structure. The core SID is the same
as the legacy G.729 SID [ITU-G.729-B]. The first enhancement layer
adds some parameters for narrowband comfort noise, while a second
enhancement layer adds wideband information. The G.729.1 SID can be
2, 3, or 6 octets long.
3. RTP Header Usage
The fields of the RTP header must be used as described in [RFC4749],
except for the Marker (M) bit.
If DTX is used, the first packet of a talkspurt -- that is, the first
packet after a silence period during which packets have not been
transmitted contiguously -- MUST be distinguished by setting the M
bit in the RTP data header to 1. The M bit in all other packets MUST
be set to 0. The beginning of a talkspurt MAY be used to adjust the
playout delay to reflect changing network delays.
If DTX is not used, the M bit MUST be set to 0 in all packets.
4. Payload Format
The payload format is the same as in [RFC4749], with the option to
add a SID at the end.
So the complete payload consists of a payload header of 1 octet (MBS
(maximum bit rate supported) and FT (frame type) fields), followed by
zero or more consecutive audio frames at the same bit rate, followed
by zero or one SID.
Note that this is consistent with the payload format of G.729
described in section 4.5.6 of [RFC3551].
To be able to transport a SID alone -- that is, without actual audio
frames -- we assign the FT value 14 to the SID. When using FT=14,
only a single SID frame SHALL be included in the payload. The actual
SID size (2, 3, or 6 octets) is inferred from the payload size: it is
the size of what is left after the payload header.
When a SID is appended to actual audio frames, the FT value remains
the one describing the encoding rate of the audio frames. Since the
SID is much smaller than any other frame, it can be easily detected
at the receiver side, and it will not hinder the calculation of the
number of frames. The actual SID size is inferred from the payload
size: it is the size of what is left after the audio frames.
Sollaud Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 5459 G.729.1 DTX Support in RTP January 2009
Section 5.4 of [RFC4749] mandates to ignore the remaining bytes after
complete frames. This document overrides that statement: the
receiver of the payload must consider these remaining bytes as a SID
frame. If the size of this remainder is not a valid SID frame size
(2, 3, or 6 octets), the receiver MUST ignore these bytes.
The full FT table is given for convenience:
+-------+---------------+-------------------+
| FT | encoding rate | frame size |
+-------+---------------+-------------------+
| 0 | 8 kbps | 20 octets |
| 1 | 12 kbps | 30 octets |
| 2 | 14 kbps | 35 octets |
| 3 | 16 kbps | 40 octets |
| 4 | 18 kbps | 45 octets |
| 5 | 20 kbps | 50 octets |
| 6 | 22 kbps | 55 octets |
| 7 | 24 kbps | 60 octets |
| 8 | 26 kbps | 65 octets |
| 9 | 28 kbps | 70 octets |
| 10 | 30 kbps | 75 octets |
| 11 | 32 kbps | 80 octets |
| 12-13 | (reserved) | - |
| 14 | SID | 2, 3, or 6 octets |
| 15 | NO_DATA | 0 |
+-------+---------------+-------------------+
DTX has no impact on the MBS definition and use.
5. Payload Format Parameters
Parameters defined in [RFC4749] are not modified. We add a new
optional parameter to configure DTX.
5.1. Media Type Registration Update
We add a new optional parameter to the audio/G7291 media subtype:
dtx: indicates that Discontinuous Transmission (DTX) is used or
preferred. Permissible values are 0 and 1. 0 means no DTX. 1
means DTX support, as described in Annex C of ITU-T Recommendation
G.729.1. 0 is implied if this parameter is omitted.
When DTX is turned off, the RTP payload MUST NOT contain a SID, and
the FT value 14 MUST NOT be used.
Sollaud Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 5459 G.729.1 DTX Support in RTP January 2009
5.2. Mapping to SDP Parameters
The information carried in the media type specification has a
specific mapping to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
[RFC4566], which is commonly used to describe RTP sessions.
The mapping described in [RFC4749] remains unchanged.
The "dtx" parameter goes in the SDP "a=fmtp" attribute.
Some example partial SDP session descriptions utilizing G.729.1
encodings follow.
Example 1: default parameters (DTX off)
m=audio 57586 RTP/AVP 96
a=rtpmap:96 G7291/16000
Example 2: recommended packet duration of 40 ms (=2 frames), maximum
bit rate is 20 kbps, DTX supported and preferred.
m=audio 49987 RTP/AVP 97
a=rtpmap:97 G7291/16000
a=fmtp:97 maxbitrate=20000; dtx=1
a=ptime:40
5.2.1. DTX Offer-Answer Model Considerations
The offer-answer model considerations of [RFC4749] fully apply. In
this section, we only define the management of the "dtx" parameter.
The "dtx" parameter concerns both sending and receiving, so both
sides of a bi-directional session MUST have the same DTX setting. If
one party indicates that it does not support DTX, DTX must be
deactivated both ways. In other words, DTX is actually activated if,
and only if, "dtx=1" in the offer and in the answer.
A special rule applies for multicast: the "dtx" parameter becomes
declarative and MUST NOT be negotiated. This parameter is fixed, and
a participant MUST use the configuration that is provided for the
session.
An RTP receiver compliant with only RFC 4749 and not this
specification will ignore the "dtx" parameter and will not include it
in its answer, so DTX will not be activated in this case. As a
remark, if that happened, this kind of receiver would not be confused
by an RTP stream with DTX because RFC 4749 requires that the bytes
that are now used for SID frames be ignored. But during the silence
Sollaud Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 5459 G.729.1 DTX Support in RTP January 2009
period, the receiver would then react using packet loss concealment
instead of comfort noise generation, leading to bad audio quality.
This justifies the use of the "dtx" parameter, even if the payload
format is backward-compatible at the binary level.
5.2.2. DTX Declarative SDP Considerations
The "dtx" parameter is declarative and provides the parameter that
SHALL be used when receiving and/or sending the configured stream.
6. Congestion Control
The congestion control considerations of [RFC4749] apply.
The use of DTX can help congestion control by reducing the number of
transmitted RTP packets and the average bandwidth of audio streams.
7. Security Considerations
The security considerations of [RFC4749] apply.
By observing the RTP flow with DTX, an attacker could see when and
for how long people are speaking. This is a general fact for DTX,
and G.729.1 DTX introduces no new specific issue.
8. IANA Considerations
IANA has assigned a new optional parameter for media subtype (audio/
G7291); see Section 5.1.
9. References
9.1. Normative References
[ITU-G.729.1] International Telecommunications Union, "G.729 based
Embedded Variable bit-rate coder: An 8-32 kbit/s
scalable wideband coder bitstream interoperable with
G.729", ITU-T Recommendation G.729.1, May 2006.
[ITU-G.729.1-C] International Telecommunications Union, "G.729.1
DTX/CNG scheme", ITU-T Recommendation G.729.1 Annex
C, May 2008.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
Sollaud Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 5459 G.729.1 DTX Support in RTP January 2009
[RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V.
Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003.
[RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP:
Session Description Protocol", RFC 4566, July 2006.
[RFC4749] Sollaud, A., "RTP Payload Format for the G.729.1
Audio Codec", RFC 4749, October 2006.
9.2. Informative References
[ITU-G.729] International Telecommunications Union, "Coding of
speech at 8 kbit/s using conjugate-structure
algebraic-code-excited linear-prediction (CS-
ACELP)", ITU-T Recommendation G.729, March 1996.
[ITU-G.729-B] International Telecommunications Union, "A silence
compression scheme for G.729 optimized for terminals
conforming to Recommendation V.70", ITU-T
Recommendation G.729 Annex B, October 1996.
[RFC3551] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Casner, "RTP Profile for
Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control",
STD 65, RFC 3551, July 2003.
Author's Address
Aurelien Sollaud
France Telecom
2 avenue Pierre Marzin
Lannion Cedex 22307
France
Phone: +33 2 96 05 15 06
EMail: aurelien.sollaud@orange-ftgroup.com
Sollaud Standards Track [Page 7]