The IMAP NOTIFY Extension
RFC 5465
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) Yes
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Based on the discussion that followed the Gen-ART Review by Brian Carpenter, I expected to see a forward reference added to the 'Overview and rationale' section to resolve this comment: > > I was slightly confused about the interaction between IDLE and NOTIFY > while reading '2. Overview and rationale'. It was only when I reached > '4. Interaction with the IDLE Command' that I understood this. It > would help if section 2 included a forward reference to section 4, like > The interaction between IDLE and NOTIFY is described in section 4. > This is not a big deal, though.
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection