Skip to main content

IMAP4 Extension for Named Searches (Filters)
RFC 5466

Yes

(Chris Newman)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2008-12-09)
Carl Wallace noted some editorial errors in his secdir review (posted Dec. 8).

In particular, the equivalency statement for the example search command in
section 3.1 appears to be missing an OR.  Perhaps the following edit is needed?

OLD:
   C: a SEARCH UID 300:900 SMALLER 5000 FROM "boss@example.com"
   SINCE "3-Dec-2002"
NEW:
   C: a SEARCH UID 300:900 OR SMALLER 5000 FROM "boss@example.com"
   SINCE "3-Dec-2002"

Other comments from Carl's review:

In section 2, "if both filter type with the same exist" should be "if
both filter types with the same name exist".  In the same sentence, "is
going to use" should probably be "MUST use".

Should the server check the syntax of the filter before storing?  The
fourth paragraph of section 3.2 gives the impression that any "non NIL
value" may be stored.