Skip to main content

The Sieve Mail-Filtering Language -- Extensions for Checking Mailbox Status and Accessing Mailbox Metadata
RFC 5490

Yes

(Lisa Dusseault)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-01-29)
I think that it would be useful for the Introduction section to provide information about the applicability of the extensions defined in the document - are they targeting end-users, administrators, both?

(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-01-28)
The abstract and introduction talk only about accessing mailbox/server
annotations, but the document also defines an extension for checking
mailbox status and creating mailboxes when needed. This should be
mentioned in the abstract and introduction.

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-01-29)
I support Russ's discuss: I believe that the text Alexey proposed adding in his January 20
message (To Spencer Dawkins cc'ed to ietf@ietf.org) would be a useful addition.

I have no other issues with this document...