The E.164 to Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI) Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Application for Infrastructure ENUM
RFC 5526

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Jon Peterson) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

Comment (2008-11-06)
No email
send info
This is a borderline discuss/comment, and deserves to be talked
about in the call.

Based on Christian's and Pasi's reviews and looking at the document
myself, it would be served better by makings its purpose clearer
in the title/abstract/introduction. Are we asking for the domain
allocation with this document or not? Is this a proposal for future
work or all that the IETF needs to do and then someone else is going
to take over the domain part?

Christian Vogt's review:

This document proposes the use of a new DNS domain for Infrastructure ENUM registrations.  The document does not yet define which DNS domain this will be, though, leaving it "to be determined".  If the IESG believes that this amount of content is sufficient to justify the publication of a separate RFC, then this document can go ahead in the publication process, as there are no critical issues IMO.  Alternatively, the document could be held until the new DNS domain is known, so that the new DNS domain could be defined within the document.

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2008-11-06)
No email
send info
On first reading, I had big difficulties in understanding the document
because it doesn't seem to specify anything (that could be implemented
and used). The title certainly leads the reader to expect a technical
specification describing an alternative to RFC 3761. However, it seems 
the document mainly describes the reasoning or motivation of why an
alternative to RFC 3761 would be useful in some circumstances. The 
document title should be adjusted accordingly (perhaps "Motivation for 
Infrastructure ENUM" or something similar?).

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection