Network File System (NFS) Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Problem Statement
RFC 5532

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Lars Eggert) Yes

(Sam Hartman) (was Discuss) Yes

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2007-11-13 for -)
No email
send info
  I have not seen a response to the Last Call comments raised by
  Sandy Murphy in her SecDir Review.

(Chris Newman) No Objection

Comment (2007-11-15 for -)
No email
send info
I'm voting no objection, but support Tim's discuss on the security
considerations.

Two pieces of advice:

* A reference to the security considerations of RFC 4297 from the
  security considerations section of this document may be about
  a 70% solution.
* When NFS requires security, I understand GSS/Kerberos is one
  mechanism that is at least widely implemented and may be used
  more than NFS+IPsec.  A discussion similar to the ones in RFC 4297
  for IPsec and TLS would be helpful to understand the impact of the
  GSS/Kerberos mechanism on RDMA.  If you need help with such text, I
  recommend asking Nicolas Williams for help.

(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection