Network File System (NFS) Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Problem Statement
RFC 5532
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert Yes
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection
I'm voting no objection, but support Tim's discuss on the security considerations. Two pieces of advice: * A reference to the security considerations of RFC 4297 from the security considerations section of this document may be about a 70% solution. * When NFS requires security, I understand GSS/Kerberos is one mechanism that is at least widely implemented and may be used more than NFS+IPsec. A discussion similar to the ones in RFC 4297 for IPsec and TLS would be helpful to understand the impact of the GSS/Kerberos mechanism on RDMA. If you need help with such text, I recommend asking Nicolas Williams for help.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
I have not seen a response to the Last Call comments raised by Sandy Murphy in her SecDir Review.
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection