Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 Multihoming
RFC 5534

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
13 (System) Notify list changed from shim6-chairs@ietf.org,draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Record position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Ward
2012-08-22
13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Magnus Westerlund
2012-08-22
13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2009-06-19
13 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2009-06-19
13 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5534' added by Cindy Morgan
2009-06-18
13 (System) RFC published
2009-03-26
13 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2009-03-25
13 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2009-03-25
13 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2009-03-25
13 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2009-03-25
13 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2009-03-25
13 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2009-02-17
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2008-07-25
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
If shim6 proto becomes experimental, then this needs to be experimental.
2008-07-25
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Cullen Jennings
2008-07-25
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
If shim6 proto becomes experimental, then this needs to be experimental.
2008-07-25
13 Mark Townsley Status date has been changed to 2009-10-1 from
2008-06-24
13 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2008-06-24
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-13.txt
2008-06-19
13 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Ward has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Ward
2008-06-06
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-12.txt
2008-03-17
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Cullen Jennings
2008-03-17
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2008-02-13
13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2008-02-13
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-11.txt
2008-01-24
13 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza
2008-01-24
13 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2008-01-24
13 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
[This is an update to the original placeholder DISCUSS for Bernard's
tsv-dir review that rolls in my comments on the document.]


Section 3.3., …
2008-01-24
13 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 3.3., paragraph 7:
> o  Positive feedback from upper layer protocols.  For instance, TCP
>    can indicate to the IP layer …
2008-01-24
13 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3.3., paragraph 6:
>    Forced Bidirectional Communication (FBD), described later in this
>    specification.  In addition, implementations MAY employ the …
2008-01-24
13 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
It would be appropriate to include in Section 9 a recommendation that failure detections and switch-over events to a backup path be communicated …
2008-01-24
13 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2008-01-23
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-10.txt
2008-01-14
13 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] Position for Magnus Westerlund has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Magnus Westerlund
2008-01-08
13 Mark Townsley Moved up 2 weeks at Jari's request.
2008-01-08
13 Mark Townsley Telechat date was changed to 2008-01-24 from 2008-01-10 by Mark Townsley
2007-12-20
13 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Russ Housley
2007-12-20
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
If shim6 proto becomes experimental, then this needs to be experimental.
2007-12-20
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Cullen Jennings
2007-12-20
13 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot discuss]
The main SHIM6 protocol document discusses a bit about firewalls. I think this discussion is even more relevant in the context of REAP. …
2007-12-20
13 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2007-12-20
13 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2007-12-20
13 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2007-12-19
13 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2007-12-19
13 David Ward
[Ballot discuss]
The semantics of the protocol and state machinery is less robust than what is defined for BFD. It is unclear why something less …
2007-12-19
13 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Ward
2007-12-19
13 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2007-12-19
13 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2007-12-19
13 Ron Bonica [Ballot comment]
I support Dan's comment on managability, but will let him hold the discuss
2007-12-19
13 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
From the SecDir by Steve Kent:
  >
  > This discussion does a good job of exploring the DoS concerns
  > …
2007-12-19
13 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
I have not seen a response to the Gen-ART Review by Eric Gray.
  The rewiew deserves a response.  It can be found …
2007-12-19
13 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2007-12-19
13 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2007-12-19
13 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
The document has no analysis or information related to the operational impact or manageability of the protocol. I would have expected as a …
2007-12-19
13 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2007-12-19
13 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2007-12-19
13 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Mark Townsley
2007-12-19
13 Mark Townsley Ballot has been issued by Mark Townsley
2007-12-19
13 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2007-12-18
13 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 4.3 Exploration Order, first sentence of paragraph 2 is slightly mangled:

  Nodes first consult the RFC 3484 default address selection rules …
2007-12-17
13 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
This is a placeholder DISCUSS until we're clear that the issues from Bernard Abobas tsv-dir review have been addressed: http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg49109.html

(I may add …
2007-12-17
13 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-12-16
13 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2007-12-16
13 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2007-12-03
13 Mark Townsley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-12-13 by Mark Townsley
2007-11-09
13 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2007-11-09
13 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Stephen Kent.
2007-11-07
13 Amanda Baber IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document
to have NO IANA Actions.
2007-10-26
13 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent
2007-10-26
13 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent
2007-10-26
13 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-10-26
13 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-10-25
13 Mark Townsley Last Call was requested by Mark Townsley
2007-10-25
13 Mark Townsley State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Mark Townsley
2007-10-25
13 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-10-25
13 (System) Last call text was added
2007-10-25
13 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-08-22
13 Jari Arkko [Note]: 'Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability
Mark is handling this for Jari as he is an author' added by Jari Arkko
2007-08-16
13 Jari Arkko
(1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?
 
          Geoff Huston
         
      …
2007-07-11
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09.txt
2007-07-10
13 Jari Arkko [Note]: 'Mark is handling this for Jari as he is an author' added by Jari Arkko
2007-07-10
13 Jari Arkko State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Jari Arkko
2007-07-10
13 Jari Arkko Waiting for document writeup from the chairs
2007-07-10
13 Jari Arkko State Change Notice email list have been change to shim6-chairs@tools.ietf.org,draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection@tools.ietf.org from shim6-chairs@tools.ietf.org
2007-07-10
13 Jari Arkko Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from None
2007-06-27
13 (System) State Changes to AD is watching from Dead by system
2007-06-22
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-08.txt
2007-06-16
13 (System) State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system
2007-06-16
13 (System) Document has expired
2006-12-13
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-07.txt
2006-10-19
13 Mark Townsley Draft Added by Mark Townsley in state AD is watching
2006-09-26
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-06.txt
2006-06-29
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-05.txt
2006-06-26
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-04.txt
2005-12-21
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-03.txt
2005-10-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-02.txt
2005-10-10
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-01.txt
2005-07-12
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-00.txt