NETCONF over Transport Layer Security (TLS)
RFC 5539

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()
No email
send info

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-03-11)
No email
send info
I support Jari and Tim's discuss positions.

If there is a need for authentication mechanisms other than TLS client
certificates for this transport, a simple protocol design pattern would
be to write a SASL profile for netconf for use in conjunction with TLS.
That's a rather simple project (a couple pages) and I'd be glad to assist
if needed.

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-03-12)
No email
send info
Couple of minor comments/suggestions:

Section 4 should explain what "third party authentication" means,
since it's not obvious from the context, and the term is not used in
any of the listed references either.

To me, references RFC4642 and and RFC5277 don't look normative, so
they probably should be in the Informative References section.

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()
No email
send info