Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop
RFC 5549

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) Yes

(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

  The Gen-ART Review by Gonzalo Camarillo posted on 8-Dec-2008 raised a
  few minor concerns that ought to be addressed:

  The acronym NLRI should also be expanded in the title of the draft.

  The Requirements Language Section could be moved to a new section
  after the Introduction (i.e., new Section 2). Right now it is
  located after the Abstract.

  Section 1, first sentence: reference RFC 4760 does not need to be
  in brackets.

  RFC 2434 has been obsoleted by RFC 5226.

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

(David Ward; former steering group member) Recuse