Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Requirements and Protocol Extensions in Support of Global Concurrent Optimization
RFC 5557
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Charlie Kaufman's SecDir review included several editorial nits that should be fixed (but this can happen during RFC editor processing).
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
It's probably worth checking that the update to <svec-list> didn't get out of step with the other -pce- documents (similar to -pce-of- while in genart). I don't think there's a problem, but someone more familiar with the whole set with me should look. If MU and mU are intended to be integers that can only be between 0 and 100, the text would benefit from explicitly stating that. (or is having an MU of 255% ok?)
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse
I am currently still working group chair for PCE. I also contributed significantly to this I-D.