Skip to main content

Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Requirements and Protocol Extensions in Support of Global Concurrent Optimization
RFC 5557

Yes

(Ross Callon)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)

Recuse


Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2009-04-07)
Charlie Kaufman's SecDir review included several editorial nits that
should be fixed (but this can happen during RFC editor processing).

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-04-07)
It's probably worth checking that the update to <svec-list> didn't get out of step with the other -pce- documents (similar to -pce-of- while in genart). I don't think there's a problem, but someone more familiar with the whole set with me should look.

If MU and mU are intended to be integers that can only be between 0 and 100, the text would benefit from explicitly stating that. (or is having an MU of 255% ok?)

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse

Recuse (2009-04-05)
I am currently still working group chair for PCE. I also contributed significantly to this I-D.