Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Architecture
RFC 5559

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2020-01-21
11 (System) Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag)
2016-11-30
11 (System) Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from pcn-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pcn-architecture@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pasi Eronen
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ross Callon
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2011-02-21
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)'s Statement about IPR related to RFC 5559
2009-06-19
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2009-06-19
11 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5559' added by Cindy Morgan
2009-06-18
11 (System) RFC published
2009-04-16
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2009-04-16
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2009-04-16
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2009-04-16
11 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2009-04-16
11 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2009-04-16
11 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2009-04-16
11 Lars Eggert State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert
2009-04-16
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ron Bonica
2009-04-15
11 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ross Callon has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ross Callon
2009-04-15
11 Lars Eggert Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-04-23 by Lars Eggert
2009-04-15
11 Lars Eggert Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-04-23 by Lars Eggert
2009-04-07
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-11.txt
2009-04-03
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-03
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Clearing my Discuss now I have found Section 12.3.

Can I suggest that you rebrand sections 12 and 13 not as appendixes. Also …
2009-04-03
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I'm going to carry on with Dave Ward's Discuss at least until I have heard an answer from the authors. I think the …
2009-04-03
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-02
11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2009-03-19
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2009-03-19
11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Pasi Eronen
2009-03-18
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-03-18
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-10.txt
2009-03-04
11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
This is trivial to resolve regardless of if the answer is yes or no. Does this draft need the pre5378 text legend?
2009-02-26
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2009-02-26
11 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
This document is extremely difficult to follow. On the telechat, Lars told us that it is difficult to follow because there are significant …
2009-02-26
11 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
This document is extremely difficult to follow. On the telechat, Lars told us that it is difficult to follow because there are significant …
2009-02-26
11 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
As its currently written, it's quite difficult to actually
understand the architecture by reading this document. We had
a useful discussion during the …
2009-02-26
11 Ross Callon
[Ballot discuss]
This is sort a "holding" discuss, which I intend to either clear or update within a couple of weeks. I would like to …
2009-02-26
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-02-26
11 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
The beginning of section 6 should mention two other parts of the
high-level approach: signalling protocol between PCN-egress-nodes and
PCN-ingress nodes, and "some …
2009-02-26
11 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-02-26
11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2009-02-26
11 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-02-26
11 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Although never expanded in the document, the acronym OAM is widely used in Section 9 as short for Operations and Management.

There is …
2009-02-26
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-02-25
11 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2009-02-25
11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
This is trivial to resolve regardless of if the answer is yes or no. Does this draft need the pre4378 text legend?
2009-02-25
11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-02-25
11 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2009-02-24
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2009-02-24
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-02-24
11 David Ward
[Ballot discuss]
This idea appears to have the issue that if the variance introduced by new sessions coming on exceeds the tolerance in the marking …
2009-02-24
11 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Ward
2009-02-23
11 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
The Gen-ART Review by Francis Dupont on 2009-02-23 provides many
  minor suggestions.  Please review them.
2009-02-23
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-02-20
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2009-02-20
11 Lars Eggert Ballot has been issued by Lars Eggert
2009-02-20
11 Lars Eggert Created "Approve" ballot
2009-02-19
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Brian Weis
2009-02-19
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Brian Weis
2009-02-18
11 Amanda Baber IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document
to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-02-10
11 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-02-10
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-02-10
11 Lars Eggert Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-02-26 by Lars Eggert
2009-02-10
11 Lars Eggert [Note]: 'Scott Bradner (sob@harvard.edu) is the Document Shepherd.' added by Lars Eggert
2009-02-10
11 Lars Eggert State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Lars Eggert
2009-02-10
11 Lars Eggert Last Call was requested by Lars Eggert
2009-02-10
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-02-10
11 (System) Last call text was added
2009-02-10
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-02-10
11 Lars Eggert State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Lars Eggert
2009-01-28
11 Amy Vezza

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?

Scott Bradner

Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, …
2009-01-28
11 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2009-01-14
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-09.txt
2008-10-20
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-08.txt
2008-09-30
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-07.txt
2008-09-10
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-06.txt
2008-08-07
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-05.txt
2008-07-14
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-04.txt
2008-02-07
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-03.txt
2007-11-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-02.txt
2007-10-29
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-01.txt
2007-08-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pcn-architecture-00.txt