Skip to main content

Softwire Hub and Spoke Deployment Framework with Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Version 2 (L2TPv2)
RFC 5571

Yes

(Mark Townsley)
(Ralph Droms)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)

Recuse

(David Ward)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert
No Objection
Comment (2009-01-14) Unknown
Very clear document. Two minor comments:

Section 1., paragraph 1:
>    The Softwires Working Group has selected Layer Two Tunneling Protocol
>    version 2 (L2TPv2) as the phase 1 protocol to be deployed in the
>    Softwire "Hubs and Spokes" solution space.  This document describes
>    the framework for the L2TPv2 "Hubs and Spokes" solution, and the
>    implementation details specified in this document should be followed
>    to achieve interoperability among different vendor implementations.

  Referring to WGs and their decision process in RFCs isn't terribly
  useful, because WGs are ephemeral. I'd suggest to rephrase this to
  talk about the technology itself.


Section 4., paragraph 0:
> 4.  Standardization Status
>
>    This section groups various Internet standards documents and other
>    publications used in Softwires.

  I don't understand the purpose of this section. Is this supposed to be
  a reading list of related work, provided for the convenience of
  implementors? If so, the section title is confusing.
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2009-04-21) Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2009-01-15) Unknown
> If Framed-IPv6-Prefix is not present but Framed-IPv6-Pool is, the SC
> must choose a prefix with that pool to send RAs.

from that pool?
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Ward Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse () Unknown