Source-Specific Media Attributes in the Session Description Protocol (SDP)
RFC 5576
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) Yes
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
> According to the defintion of SDP, interpreters of SDP session Typo
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was No Record, No Objection, Discuss) No Objection
Please consider these editorial comments raised by Francis Dupont in the Gen-ART Review on 5-Feb-2009. Nits/editorial comments: - Abstract page 1: The Session Description Protocol -> ... (SDP) - 3 page 4: receivers (who may never -> receivers (which may never - 3 page 4 (twice): i.e. -> i.e., - 4 page 5: synchronizaton -> synchronization - 9 page 12: defintion -> definition - 10 page 12: 0 - 2**32 - 1 -> 0 .. 2**32 - 1 - 12.3 page 15: gropuing -> grouping - Authors' page 18: NJ 07601, US -> NJ 07601, USA
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection