Transport Security Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
RFC 5591

Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 10 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.

(Dan Romascanu) Yes

(Sean Turner) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) (was Yes, No Objection) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2009-05-04)
No email
send info
Section 1.2
Helpful if s/STD62/STD62 [RFC3411]/

Section 1.5
You seem to fluctuate in your usage of RFC 2119 language.
In bullet 3, I suggest s/may not/might not/

Section 2.3.1
Notwithstanding the requirement to read the reference material, please
expand ASI on first use.

Section 3.1.2
"REQUIRES" is not in the RFC 2119 lexicon.

Section 3.1.3
"and other MIB modules" is a bit vague.

Section 3.1.3
   IANA maintains a registry for transport domains and the corresponding
   prefix.
Would be helpful to include a pointer (perhaps by registry name, or by
defining RFC) to this registry. 

Section 7
Useful if FROM clauses can give a comment that shows the RFC that 
defines the module from which the import is taken.
For example
FROM SNMPv2-SMI  -- RFC 2578

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Amy Vezza) No Objection

(David Harrington) Recuse

Ignas Bagdonas No Record

Deborah Brungard No Record

Alissa Cooper No Record

Roman Danyliw No Record

Benjamin Kaduk No Record

Suresh Krishnan No Record

Warren Kumari No Record

Mirja Kühlewind No Record

Barry Leiba No Record

Alexey Melnikov No Record

Alvaro Retana No Record

Adam Roach No Record

Martin Vigoureux No Record

Éric Vyncke No Record

Magnus Westerlund No Record