The Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) Service Codes
RFC 5595

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) (was Discuss) Yes

Comment (2009-05-07)
No email
send info
Also, gcc says "suggest parentheses around arithmetic
in operand of |".

The document says:

   o  It preserves the four bits of the final bytes of the Service Code,
      allowing mapping common series of Service Codes to adjacent ports,
      e.g. Foo1, and Foo2; and Fooa and Foob would be assigned adjacent

True, but you maybe you should also mention that this only applies
on 0-9 and A-O and P-Z, not between them... because of the 4 bits and
how ASCII codes have been defined. E.g., 

SC:srva => 62481
SC:srvb => 62482
SC:srvn => 62494
SC:srvo => 62495
SC:srvp => 62464

That is, there is a discontinuity between O and P.

(Lars Eggert) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

Comment (2009-05-05 for -)
No email
send info
support Tim's discuss

Alexey Melnikov No Objection

Comment (2009-04-12 for -)
No email
send info
The document should have an informative reference for ASCII:

   [ANSI.X3-4.1986]  American National Standards Institute, "Coded
                     Character Set - 7-bit American Standard Code for
                     Information Interchange", ANSI X3.4, 1986.

Am I correct that the SC: convention can't be used to represent full range of Service Codes?

(Tim Polk) No Objection

Comment (2009-05-07 for -)
No email
send info
I support Pasi's discuss regarding section 4.  If this content is important to this document, it needs to be reflected throughout (e.g, covered in the intro and security considerations...)

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

Comment (2009-05-06 for -)
No email
send info
Support Pasi's comment about section 4.

Also note that the URI for iperf in the references has not resolved since I started trying it a couple of days ago.

Magnus Westerlund No Objection