Skip to main content

Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance
RFC 5606

Yes

(Cullen Jennings)
(Jari Arkko)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-05-31)
1. Introduction

 [...]

   The Session Initiation Protocol [RFC3261] is one proposed Using
   Protocol for PIDF-LO.

This sentence doesn't read well.

2. Problem Statement

 [...]

   Bear in mind, however, that <retransmission-allowed> is not intended
   to provide any protocol-level mechanism to prevent unauthorized
   parties from learning location through means like eavesdropping.  It
   is merely a way to express the preferences of the Rule Maker to the
   LR.

LR is not defined. I think it should be defined after introducing Location Recipient in the previous paragraph of the same section.

The same comment about first use of LS later in the same section.

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()