Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance
RFC 5606

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

From: The IESG <>
To: IETF-Announce <>
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <>,
    RFC Editor <>, 
    geopriv mailing list <>, 
    geopriv chair <>
Subject: Document Action: 'Implications of 
         'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance' to 
         Informational RFC 

The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance '
   <draft-ietf-geopriv-sip-lo-retransmission-02.txt> as an Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Geographic Location/Privacy Working 

The IESG contact persons are Cullen Jennings and Robert Sparks.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:

Technical Summary

This document explores an ambiguity in the interpretation of the
<retransmission-allowed> element of the Presence Information Data Format
for Location Objects (PIDF-LO) in cases where PIDF-LO is conveyed by the
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP). It provides recommendations for how
the SIP location conveyance mechanism should adapt to this ambiguity.

Working Group Summary

This document was produced in order to express the consensus of the
GEOPRIV working group on a privacy issue raised by location conveyance
in the SIP protocol. There is thus strong consensus within GEOPRIV
around the core privacy recommendations in the document.

Document Quality

The document has been reviewed by key participants from the GEOPRIV,
SIP, and privacy community, and its recommendations have been
implemented in draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-13.


   Document Shepherd is Richard Barnes.

RFC Editor Note

At the end of first paragraph of the Abstract 
	these ambiguities
        this ambiguity