Skip to main content

The Use of the SIPS URI Scheme in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RFC 5630

Yes

(Cullen Jennings)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)

No Objection

(Chris Newman)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert
No Objection
Comment (2008-11-05)
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 4346 (Obsoleted by RFC 5246)

Section 3.2., paragraph 1:
>    request was delivered securily on each hop, while in fact, in was
  Nit: s/securily/securely/

Section 5.1.1., paragraph 6:
>    To emphasise what is already defined in [RFC3261], UAs MUST NOT use
  Nit: s/emphasise/emphasize/ (also elsewhere)

Section 5.4., paragraph 4:
>    used inconsistenty (e.g,, the Request-URI is a SIPS URI, but the
  Nit: s/inconsistenty/inconsistently/

Section 6.3., paragraph 2:
>    Edge Proxy B. Note that Registar/Authoritative Proxy B preserved the
  Nit: s/Registar/Registrar/ (also elsewhere)
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
No Objection (2008-11-06)
section 3.2

s/securily/securely/

in several places:

s/inconsistenty/inconsistently/