IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
RFC 5660

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
11 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'This document specifies, abstractly, how to interface applications and transport protocols with IPsec so as to …
2016-11-30
11 (System) Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'Unknown'
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from btns-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pasi Eronen
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2009-10-28
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2009-10-28
11 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5660' added by Cindy Morgan
2009-10-28
11 (System) RFC published
2009-08-18
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2009-08-18
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2009-08-18
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2009-08-17
11 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2009-08-17
11 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2009-08-17
11 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2009-08-17
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2009-08-16
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Russ Housley
2009-08-13
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-11.txt
2009-06-18
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
I am unsure that the SCTP section defines behavior which is consistent with application expectations.  The last paragraph of 5.4 implies that the …
2009-06-16
11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Remaining issues:

>o  When the key manager informs a ULP that a connection latch has
>  been administratively transitioned to the CLOSED state …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Remaining issues:

>o  When the key manager informs a ULP that a connection latch has
>  been administratively transitioned to the CLOSED state …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
> The
> REQUIRED set of parameters bound in IPsec channels is:
> o  Type of protection: confidentiality and/or integrity protection;
> o  …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Remaining issues:

> If no connection latch exists in the ESTABLISHED states with
> the same 5-tuple, and if there exist no child …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
> The
> REQUIRED set of parameters bound in IPsec channels is:
> o  Type of protection: confidentiality and/or integrity protection;
> o  …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Remaining issues:


> o  CLOSED (by the ULP, the application or administratively)
> and always have an associated owner, or holder, such as …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
> The
> REQUIRED set of parameters bound in IPsec channels is:
> o  Type of protection: confidentiality and/or integrity protection;
> o  …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Remaining issues:


> The SAs that protect a given IPsec channel's packets may change over
> time in that they may expire and …
2009-05-14
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Remaining issues:

> The
> REQUIRED set of parameters bound in IPsec channels is:
> o  Type of protection: confidentiality and/or integrity protection; …
2009-04-17
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have cleared my Discuss leaving two small points that are worthy of consideration for additional text.

---
>> The first two comments …
2009-04-17
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-16
11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Pasi Eronen
2009-04-09
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-10.txt
2009-04-03
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I'm going to carry on with Dave Ward's Discuss at least until I have heard a response from the authors. I think the …
2009-04-03
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-02
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2009-03-25
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-03-25
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-09.txt
2009-03-12
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2009-03-12
11 David Ward
[Ballot discuss]
A few unrelated comments:

The first two comments can be summarized what is the protection/restoration strategy?
- Once one can latch flows to …
2009-03-12
11 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
I have reviewed draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-08, and have a
couple of concerns that I'd like to discuss before recommending
approval of the document:

My first …
2009-03-12
11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2009-03-11
11 (System) State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by system
2009-02-27
11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-02-26
2009-02-26
11 Pasi Eronen State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Pasi Eronen
2009-02-26
11 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
Imagine the case where a an ULP has sent 30 k of data and stuffed it into a TCP connection but the kernel …
2009-02-26
11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-02-26
11 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot comment]
I like the concept but wIthout the API's is nothing to standardize here - there no change on the wire, there's no change …
2009-02-26
11 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot comment]
I like the concept but wIthout the API's is nothing to standardize here - there no change on the wire, there's no change …
2009-02-26
11 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-02-26
11 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2009-02-25
11 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2009-02-25
11 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
I support advancement of this technology, but believe it needs some
revision to address comments from Elwyn Davies and IESG discuss
positions.

While …
2009-02-25
11 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Chris Newman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Chris Newman
2009-02-25
11 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2009-02-25
11 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Elwyn Davies on 24-Feb-2009 includes some very
  significant comments.  Please respond to this review.  The review can
  …
2009-02-25
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-02-25
11 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2009-02-25
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This is good stuff, but I had a number of issues relating to imprecise
language to describe what exactly is required. Note that …
2009-02-25
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This is good stuff, but I had a number of issues relating to imprecise
language to describe what exactly is required. Note that …
2009-02-25
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This is good stuff, but I had a number of issues relating to imprecise
language to describe what exactly is required. Note that …
2009-02-25
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2009-02-25
11 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-02-24
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2009-02-24
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-02-24
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-02-24
11 David Ward
[Ballot discuss]
A few unrelated comments:

- Once one can latch flows to an IPsec tunnel then one may want to latch flows to a …
2009-02-24
11 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Ward
2009-02-23
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-02-23
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
[I-D.ietf-btns-prob-and-applic] has been published as Informational (RFC5387) and this is hence a DOWNREF. I believe it can simply move to the Informative References …
2009-02-23
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
[I-D.ietf-btns-prob-and-applic] has been published as Informational (RFC5387) and this is hence a DOWNREF. I believer it can simply become an Informative reference, if …
2009-02-23
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
I'd be better if Figure 4 and its explanatory text in Section 2.2.2 used the IP ranges set aside for documentation and dynamic …
2009-02-23
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
[I-D.ietf-btns-prob-and-applic] has been published as Informational (RFC5387) and his hence a DOWNREF. I believer it can simply become an Informative reference, if the …
2009-02-23
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-02-20
11 Tim Polk Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-02-26 by Tim Polk
2009-02-20
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk
2009-02-20
11 Tim Polk Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk
2009-02-20
11 Tim Polk Created "Approve" ballot
2009-02-19
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2009-02-19
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2009-02-17
11 Amanda Baber IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-02-10
11 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-02-10
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-02-10
11 Tim Polk State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Tim Polk
2009-02-10
11 Tim Polk Last Call was requested by Tim Polk
2009-02-10
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-02-10
11 (System) Last call text was added
2009-02-10
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2008-11-03
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-08.txt
2008-07-30
11 Tim Polk State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Tim Polk
2008-06-12
11 Cindy Morgan
  (1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Has the
          Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the …
2008-06-12
11 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2008-04-15
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-07.txt
2008-02-25
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-06.txt
2008-01-10
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-05.txt
2007-12-09
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-04.txt
2007-09-17
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-03.txt
2007-09-12
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-02.txt
2007-09-02
11 (System) Document has expired
2007-03-01
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-01.txt
2006-02-27
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-btns-connection-latching-00.txt