Industrial Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks
RFC 5673

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
06 (System) Changed document authors from "Tom Phinney, Pascal Thubert, Sicco Dwars" to "Tom Phinney, Pascal Thubert, Sicco Dwars, Kris Pister"
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from roll-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2009-10-23
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2009-10-23
06 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5673' added by Amy Vezza
2009-10-21
06 (System) RFC published
2009-08-20
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2009-08-19
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2009-08-19
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2009-08-19
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2009-08-19
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2009-08-19
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2009-08-19
06 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2009-08-19
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2009-06-29
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2009-06-05
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-06-05
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs-06.txt
2009-05-24
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Glen Zorn.
2009-05-08
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-05-07
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I liked the way the draft was written, and it provides an interesting
view into this application space. I think the picture it ...
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I liked the way the draft was written, and it provides an interesting
view into this application space. I think the picture it ...
2009-05-07
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Here's a solicited review from Thomas Clausen:

The requirements documents present a highly "desirable" set of
properties for routing protocols -- which may not ...
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I liked the way the draft was written, and it provides an interesting
view into this application space. I think the picture it ...
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I liked the way the draft was written, and it provides an interesting
view into this application space. I think the picture it ...
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Here's a solicited review from Thomas Clausen:

The various roll routing requirement documents lists no
less than 46 "MUST-requirements" and about 30
"SHOULD-requirements". ...
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot discuss]
...
2009-05-07
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2009-05-07
06 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2009-05-07
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Tim's COMMENT about the explicit impact of security issues on a ROLL routing protocol.

More generally, the document might be ...
2009-05-07
06 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-05-07
06 Ross Callon
[Ballot comment]
I think that this document does quite a good job of describing the requirements in a way that can be understood by a ...
2009-05-07
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2009-05-07
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
section 11. Security

s/Security/Security Considerations/

s/encrypted with unique/encrypted with statistically unique/

Section 11 also does not explore the implications of these security requirements ...
2009-05-07
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-05-07
06 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-05-07
06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
I salute the inclusion of the manageability section, and I would support the document, but I believe that the current paragraph that lists ...
2009-05-07
06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
I salute the inclusion of the manageability section, and I would support the document, but I believe that the current paragraph that lists ...
2009-05-07
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-05-06
06 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2009-05-06
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-05-05
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-05-05
06 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-04-29
06 Adrian Farrel Ballot has been issued by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-21
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-21
06 Adrian Farrel Created "Approve" ballot
2009-04-21
06 Adrian Farrel State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-21
06 Adrian Farrel Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-05-07 by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-21
06 Adrian Farrel
[Note]: 'This I-D was updated after IETF last call to synchronise with IESG review comments made for draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs. It also pickes up GenArt review coments.' ...
2009-04-21
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-04-21
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs-05.txt
2009-04-19
06 Adrian Farrel State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-19
06 Adrian Farrel State Changes to AD Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-02
06 Adrian Farrel Responsible AD has been changed to Adrian Farrel from David Ward
2009-03-10
06 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-03-05
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-02-26
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Glen Zorn
2009-02-26
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Glen Zorn
2009-02-19
06 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2009-02-19
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2009-02-19
06 David Ward Last Call was requested by David Ward
2009-02-19
06 David Ward State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by David Ward
2009-02-19
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-02-19
06 (System) Last call text was added
2009-02-19
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-01-23
06 Amy Vezza
Proto-write-up for draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs

Intended status : Informational Track

> (1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Has the
>        Document ...
2009-01-23
06 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2009-01-22
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs-04.txt
2008-12-19
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs-03.txt
2008-10-31
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs-02.txt
2008-07-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs-01.txt
2008-04-28
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-roll-indus-routing-reqs-00.txt