Skip to main content

GEOPRIV Layer 7 Location Configuration Protocol: Problem Statement and Requirements
RFC 5687

Yes

(Cullen Jennings)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-06-25)
In Section 6:

   The following requirements and assumptions have been identified:

   Requirement L7-1: Identifier Choice

      The L7 LCP MUST be able to carry different identifiers or MUST
      define an identifier that is mandatory to implement.

Did you mean "identifier type" here?

      Regarding
      the latter aspect, such an identifier is only appropriate if it is
      from the same realm as the one for which the location information
      service maintains identifier to location mapping.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2009-07-01)
There are plenty of acronyms not expanded at the first occurence: USB, DSL, PPoE, etc.

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2009-07-01)
There are some typo/grammar issues with the Note blocks added to the start of Sections 4 and 5 that need to be corrected before publication.

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()