Extended MKCOL for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)
RFC 5689
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
06 | (System) | Notify list changed from vcarddav-chairs@ietf.org, cyrus@daboo.name, julian.reschke@greenbytes.de to julian.reschke@greenbytes.de |
|
2009-10-01
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2009-10-01
|
06 | Amy Vezza | [Note]: 'RFC 5689' added by Amy Vezza |
|
2009-09-30
|
06 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2009-09-02
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2009-08-31
|
06 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
|
2009-08-31
|
06 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
|
2009-08-31
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2009-08-31
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2009-08-31
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2009-08-28
|
06 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-08-27 |
|
2009-08-27
|
06 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
|
2009-08-27
|
06 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
|
2009-08-27
|
06 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
|
2009-08-27
|
06 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
|
2009-08-27
|
06 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
|
2009-08-27
|
06 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk |
|
2009-08-26
|
06 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
|
2009-08-26
|
06 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks |
|
2009-08-26
|
06 | Ralph Droms | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms |
|
2009-08-26
|
06 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
|
2009-08-26
|
06 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
|
2009-08-25
|
06 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel |
|
2009-08-25
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
|
2009-08-24
|
06 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
|
2009-08-18
|
06 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Ran Canetti. |
|
2009-08-18
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | AD review and GenArt review comments were addressed. |
|
2009-08-18
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-06.txt |
|
2009-08-17
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-08-27 by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-08-17
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-08-17
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-08-17
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | Ballot has been issued by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-08-17
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2009-08-17
|
06 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2009-08-05
|
06 | Amanda Baber | IANA comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2009-08-03
|
06 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ran Canetti |
|
2009-08-03
|
06 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ran Canetti |
|
2009-08-03
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2009-08-03
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2009-08-02
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-08-02
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | Nothing major found, mostly typos in examples. |
|
2009-08-02
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | Last Call was requested by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-08-02
|
06 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2009-08-02
|
06 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2009-08-02
|
06 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2009-08-02
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-07-28
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-07-16
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | [Note]: 'Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> agreed to shepherd the document.' added by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-07-16
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of … (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document and, in particular, does he or she believe this version is ready for forwarding to the IESG for publication? - Julian Reschke (julian.reschke@gmx.de) - Yes, and Yes. (1.b) Has the document had adequate review both from key WG members and from key non-WG members? Does the Document Shepherd have any concerns about the depth or breadth of the reviews that have been performed? No reviews outside of the WG. No concerns about the depth of the reviews. (1.c) Does the Document Shepherd have concerns that the document needs more review from a particular or broader perspective, e.g., security, operational complexity, someone familiar with AAA, internationalization or XML? - No. (1.d) Does the Document Shepherd have any specific concerns or issues with this document that the Responsible Area Director and/or the IESG should be aware of? For example, perhaps he or she is uncomfortable with certain parts of the document, or has concerns whether there really is a need for it. In any event, if the WG has discussed those issues and has indicated that it still wishes to advance the document, detail those concerns here. Has an IPR disclosure related to this document been filed? If so, please include a reference to the disclosure and summarize the WG discussion and conclusion on this issue. - No concerns. (1.e) How solid is the WG consensus behind this document? Does it represent the strong concurrence of a few individuals, with others being silent, or does the WG as a whole understand and agree with it? - It represents WG consensus among those who care about the WebDAV related deliverables. (1.f) Has anyone threatened an appeal or otherwise indicated extreme discontent? If so, please summarise the areas of conflict in separate email messages to the Responsible Area Director. (It should be in a separate email because this questionnaire is entered into the ID Tracker.) - No. (1.g) Has the Document Shepherd personally verified that the document satisfies all ID nits? (See http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html and http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/). Boilerplate checks are not enough; this check needs to be thorough. Has the document met all formal review criteria it needs to, such as the MIB Doctor, media type and URI type reviews? - Yes. idnits 2.11.12 reports no issues for -05. (1.h) Has the document split its references into normative and informative? Are there normative references to documents that are not ready for advancement or are otherwise in an unclear state? If such normative references exist, what is the strategy for their completion? Are there normative references that are downward references, as described in [RFC3967]? If so, list these downward references to support the Area Director in the Last Call procedure for them [RFC3967]. - All references are normative and there are no downrefs or references to drafts. (1.i) Has the Document Shepherd verified that the document IANA consideration section exists and is consistent with the body of the document? If the document specifies protocol extensions, are reservations requested in appropriate IANA registries? Are the IANA registries clearly identified? If the document creates a new registry, does it define the proposed initial contents of the registry and an allocation procedure for future registrations? Does it suggest a reasonable name for the new registry? See [RFC5226]. If the document describes an Expert Review process has Shepherd conferred with the Responsible Area Director so that the IESG can appoint the needed Expert during the IESG Evaluation? - Document does not require IANA actions, and states that. (1.j) Has the Document Shepherd verified that sections of the document that are written in a formal language, such as XML code, BNF rules, MIB definitions, etc., validate correctly in an automated checker? - Yes (XML examples and DTD fragments checked) (1.k) The IESG approval announcement includes a Document Announcement Write-Up. Please provide such a Document Announcement Write-Up? Recent examples can be found in the "Action" announcements for approved documents. The approval announcement contains the following sections: Technical Summary This specification extends the Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) MKCOL method to allow collections of arbitrary resourcetype to be created and to allow properties to be set at the same time. It avoids minting new MK* methods (such as MKCALENDAR) for each new type of collection. Working Group Summary Process was smooth; the only early disagreement was about the scope of this document (whether it should apply to non-collection resources as well, and whether it should also setting ACLs). In the end, the WG converged on the minimal functionality needed to resolve the issue. Document Quality This protocol extension defined in this document is used by the VCARDDAV protocol (another deliverable of the Working Group), for which several vendors have announced support (for instance, Apple, and Viagenie). Personnel The Document Shepherd for this document was Julian Reschke, and the responsible Area Director is Alexey Melnikov. |
|
2009-07-16
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | Draft Added by Alexey Melnikov in state AD is watching |
|
2009-07-16
|
06 | Alexey Melnikov | [Note]: 'Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> agreed to shepherd the document.' added by Alexey Melnikov |
|
2009-07-13
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-05.txt |
|
2009-03-09
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-04.txt |
|
2009-02-10
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-03.txt |
|
2008-11-28
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-02.txt |
|
2008-11-25
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-01.txt |
|
2008-11-17
|
06 | (System) | Document has expired |
|
2008-05-29
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-vcarddav-webdav-mkcol-00.txt |