Sieve Email Filtering: MIME Part Tests, Iteration, Extraction, Replacement, and Enclosure
RFC 5703
Yes
(Lisa Dusseault)
No Objection
Lars Eggert
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Recuse
(Alexey Melnikov)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert
No Objection
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-07-18)
Unknown
I think the Introduction is a bit terse. It should at least have a very brief statement about what Sieve is with a reference to RFC 5228. This would then give context to the statement This extension defines mechanisms for performing tests on MIME body parts... === Section 2. Notwithstanding... Conventions for notations are as in [RFC5228] section 1.1. ...it would be helpful to include a normative reference to RFC 5234 === Section 4.1 Usage: The definition of [MIMEOPTS] is: I am not so hot on ABNF, but shouldn't this read... Usage: The definition of MIMEOPTS is: as the [] is an ABNF notation not part of the name.
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-08-12)
Unknown
It could be useful if the examples 9.1 and 9.2 included a warning saying that circumventing these tests is easy (e.g. the list of file extensions that are considered "executable and unsafe" by Outlook is almost 100 entries, and other Content-Types may be used, too), so the SIEVE code here is not intended to be used in real world.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2009-08-14)
Unknown
There is at least one occurrence of "SIEVE" in section 11, but most (all?) other occurrences are "Sieve" For consistency, suggest the global change s/SIEVE/Sieve/
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Recuse
Recuse
()
Unknown