Skip to main content

PathErr Message Triggered MPLS and GMPLS LSP Reroutes
RFC 5710

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2009-09-09)
> the ERO received in the LSP's incoming Path message does not preclude

Term ERO not yet defined

> A transit node MAY act on a reroute request locally when the ERO
> received in the LSP's incoming Path message does not precluded the
> reroute. 

... does not preclude ?

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2009-09-21)
I'm a little concerned by this language in the Security Considerations section:

   This
   document does introduce a new error code value, but this value is
   functionally equivalent to existing semantics. 

If the semantics are the same, why have a new error code at all? Is the sentence really trying to say the semantics are similar enough to other things that the security impacts are already well understood?

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()