Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension
RFC 5746

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
03 (System) Notify list changed from tls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation@ietf.org to (None)
2010-02-12
03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-12
03 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5746' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-12
03 (System) RFC published
2010-01-08
03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-01-07
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-01-07
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-01-07
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-01-07
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-01-07
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-01-07
03 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-01-07
03 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-01-07
03 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-01-05
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-03.txt
2009-12-18
03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-12-17
2009-12-17
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Amy Vezza
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
Updated as per revision -02:

Sorry about flipping back and forth between YES and DISCUSS. But I think the following text is a ...
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
3.  Extension Definition

  This requirement to
  validate any received RI extension still applies even after previous

The acronym RI should be ...
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
Updated as per revision -02:

Sorry about flipping back and forth between YES and DISCUSS. But I think the following text is a ...
2009-12-17
03 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Alexey Melnikov
2009-12-17
03 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
3.  Extension Definition

  This requirement to
  validate any received RI extension still applies even after previous

The acronym RI should be ...
2009-12-17
03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
1.  Introduction

[...]

  If certificate-based client authentication is used, the server will
  believe that the initial traffic corresponds to the authenticated ...
2009-12-17
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2009-12-17
03 Pasi Eronen State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Pasi Eronen
2009-12-17
03 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-12-16
03 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-12-16
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-02.txt
2009-12-16
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
1.  Introduction

[...]

  If certificate-based client authentication is used, the server will
  believe that the initial traffic corresponds to the authenticated ...
2009-12-16
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
I will be moving to Yes after discussing this issue.

I believe due to seriousness of this issue the document needs to include: ...
2009-12-16
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Alexey Melnikov
2009-12-16
03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2009-12-16
03 Pasi Eronen State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Pasi Eronen
2009-12-16
03 Pasi Eronen Note field has been cleared by Pasi Eronen
2009-12-16
03 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-12-15
03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-12-15
03 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have some sympathy with Russ's Comment, and my initial reaction having read the problem statement was to ask whether we actually need ...
2009-12-15
03 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have some sympathy witrh Russ's Comment, and my initial reaction having read the problem statement was to ask whether we actually need ...
2009-12-15
03 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-12-15
03 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I am satisfied that this solution is workable and resolves the problem at hand.  I understand that
other solutions exist and have been ...
2009-12-14
03 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2009-12-14
03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
1.  Introduction

  To start the attack, the attacker forms a TLS connection to the
  server (perhaps in response to an initial ...
2009-12-14
03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2009-12-14
03 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
As a protocol climbs the IETF standards-track maturity ladder, we
  sometimes drop features.  I would rather see renegotiation dropped
  from TLS ...
2009-12-14
03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-12-14
03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-12-14
03 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-12-11
03 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-12-09
03 Amanda Baber
IANA comments:

Action 1:

Upon approval of this document, IANA will make the following
assignment in the "ExtensionType Values" registry at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values/tls-extensiontype-values.xhtml

Value Extension name ...
2009-12-08
03 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pasi Eronen
2009-12-08
03 Pasi Eronen Ballot has been issued by Pasi Eronen
2009-12-08
03 Pasi Eronen Created "Approve" ballot
2009-12-08
03 Pasi Eronen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-12-17 by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-30
03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-11-30
03 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-11-28
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2009-11-28
03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Hartman
2009-11-27
03 Pasi Eronen Last Call was requested by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-27
03 Pasi Eronen State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-27
03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-11-27
03 (System) Last call text was added
2009-11-27
03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-11-27
03 Pasi Eronen State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-27
03 Pasi Eronen Draft Added by Pasi Eronen in state AD is watching
2009-11-26
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-01.txt
2009-11-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation-00.txt