Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax
RFC 5754
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2020-01-21
|
11 | (System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag) |
|
2015-10-14
|
11 | (System) | Notify list changed from smime-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-smime-sha2@ietf.org to (None) |
|
2012-08-22
|
11 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Chris Newman |
|
2012-08-22
|
11 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pasi Eronen |
|
2012-08-22
|
11 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert |
|
2011-01-13
|
(System) | ||
|
2010-01-25
|
11 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan |
|
2010-01-25
|
11 | Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'RFC 5754' added by Cindy Morgan |
|
2010-01-25
|
11 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2009-05-27
|
(System) | Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis, draft-rescorla-tls-suiteb, draft-ietf-tls-extractor, draft-green-secsh-ecc, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis … Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis, draft-rescorla-tls-suiteb, draft-ietf-tls-extractor, draft-green-secsh-ecc, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis, dra... |
|
|
2009-05-18
|
(System) | Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-smime-3278bis, draft-ietf-smime-sha2, draft-ietf-smime-multisig, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-green-secsh-ecc … Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-smime-3278bis, draft-ietf-smime-sha2, draft-ietf-smime-multisig, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-green-secsh-ecc, draft-ie... |
|
|
2009-02-19
|
11 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan |
|
2009-02-19
|
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
|
2009-02-19
|
11 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
|
2009-02-19
|
11 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2009-02-19
|
11 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2009-02-19
|
11 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2009-02-19
|
11 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza |
|
2009-01-27
|
11 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Chris Newman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Chris Newman |
|
2009-01-27
|
11 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Pasi Eronen |
|
2009-01-20
|
11 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-11.txt |
|
2008-12-29
|
11 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot discuss] The SMIMECapability values for sha*WithRSAEncryption don't parse with OpenSSL's asn1parse tool? (all the other ones look OK) |
|
2008-12-22
|
11 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
|
2008-12-22
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-10.txt |
|
2008-12-12
|
11 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert |
|
2008-12-12
|
11 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot comment] Pasi took over my discuss. |
|
2008-12-12
|
11 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot discuss] Section 2: Hmm, I think there's one important exception to the "must generate SHA2 AlgorithmIdentifiers with absent parameteres" rule: the EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 padding used … [Ballot discuss] Section 2: Hmm, I think there's one important exception to the "must generate SHA2 AlgorithmIdentifiers with absent parameteres" rule: the EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 padding used in RSA signatures? Taking also Lars's discuss: RFC2313 is an obsolete normative reference; the text should point to RFC3447,and more specifically the RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 signature algorithm (since that's the only RSA algorithm discussed in this draft). |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] I agree with the discusses, though. Also: > 2.1. SHA-224 > ... > > The parameters are as specified in Section 2. We … [Ballot comment] I agree with the discusses, though. Also: > 2.1. SHA-224 > ... > > The parameters are as specified in Section 2. We are in Section 2, maybe you could have said "at the beginning of Section 2" or something like that. |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] > 2.1. SHA-224 > ... > > The parameters are as specified in Section 2. We are in Section 2, maybe you could … [Ballot comment] > 2.1. SHA-224 > ... > > The parameters are as specified in Section 2. We are in Section 2, maybe you could have said "at the beginning of Section 2" or something like that. |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] > 2.1. SHA-224 > ... > > The parameters are as specified in Section 2. We are in Section 2! |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Chris Newman | [Ballot discuss] I'm concerned about the transition mechanism from the deployed algorithms to these new algorithms. Shouldn't this specification at least mention that these OIDs … [Ballot discuss] I'm concerned about the transition mechanism from the deployed algorithms to these new algorithms. Shouldn't this specification at least mention that these OIDs can be used as an SMIMECapability [RFC 3851]? Or will we have to write separate specs updating RFC 3851 (and every other CMS application's capability mechanism) every time we add a new CMS algorithm before it's legal to announce use of those algorithms? For that matter, it's unclear to me how SMIMECapability can actually be useful without an extension to vCard that allows it to be stored in a personal address book entry... |
|
2008-12-11
|
11 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Chris Newman |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | David Ward | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot discuss] Section 6.1., paragraph 4: > [RFC2313] Kaliski, B., "PKCS #1: RSA Encryption Version 1.5", RFC > … [Ballot discuss] Section 6.1., paragraph 4: > [RFC2313] Kaliski, B., "PKCS #1: RSA Encryption Version 1.5", RFC > 2313, March 1998. DISCUSS: Obsolete normative reference: RFC 2313 (Obsoleted by RFC 2437). Can be updated through an RFC Editor Note. (I'm only making this a discuss because it's a normative reference.) |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot discuss] Section 2: Hmm, I think there's one important exception to the "must generate SHA2 AlgorithmIdentifiers with absent parameteres" rule: the EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 padding used … [Ballot discuss] Section 2: Hmm, I think there's one important exception to the "must generate SHA2 AlgorithmIdentifiers with absent parameteres" rule: the EMSA-PKCS1-v1_5 padding used in RSA signatures? |
|
2008-12-10
|
11 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
|
2008-12-09
|
11 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
|
2008-12-09
|
11 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
|
2008-12-06
|
11 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
|
2008-11-27
|
11 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2008-11-24
|
11 | Amanda Baber | IANA Last Call comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2008-11-21
|
11 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk |
|
2008-11-21
|
11 | Tim Polk | Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk |
|
2008-11-21
|
11 | Tim Polk | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2008-11-18
|
11 | Tim Polk | Telechat date was changed to 2008-12-11 from 2008-12-04 by Tim Polk |
|
2008-11-13
|
11 | Cindy Morgan | Last call sent |
|
2008-11-13
|
11 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-11-13
|
11 | Tim Polk | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-12-04 by Tim Polk |
|
2008-11-13
|
11 | Tim Polk | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Tim Polk |
|
2008-11-13
|
11 | Tim Polk | Last Call was requested by Tim Polk |
|
2008-10-30
|
(System) | ||
|
2008-10-09
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-09.txt |
|
2008-09-26
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-08.txt |
|
2008-09-22
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-07.txt |
|
2008-09-10
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-06.txt |
|
2008-05-09
|
11 | Tim Polk | Document publication blocked on normative reference [ECCADD]. ECCADD is mature and should have wg last call "soon". |
|
2008-04-29
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-05.txt |
|
2008-04-20
|
11 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Uri Blumenthal. |
|
2008-04-03
|
11 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Uri Blumenthal |
|
2008-04-03
|
11 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Uri Blumenthal |
|
2008-04-03
|
11 | Samuel Weiler | Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Jeffrey Hutzelman was rejected |
|
2008-03-11
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-04.txt |
|
2008-03-07
|
11 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2008-03-05
|
11 | Amanda Baber | IANA Last Call comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2008-02-25
|
11 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman |
|
2008-02-25
|
11 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Jeffrey Hutzelman |
|
2008-02-22
|
11 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2008-02-22
|
11 | Tim Polk | Last Call was requested by Tim Polk |
|
2008-02-22
|
11 | Tim Polk | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk |
|
2008-02-22
|
11 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2008-02-22
|
11 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2008-02-22
|
11 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2008-02-21
|
11 | Tim Polk | Draft Added by Tim Polk in state Publication Requested |
|
2008-01-30
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-03.txt |
|
2008-01-28
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-02.txt |
|
2007-07-26
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-01.txt |
|
2007-05-21
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-sha2-00.txt |