An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization
RFC 5755

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss) Yes

(Tim Polk) Yes

(Jari Arkko) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-04-20 for -)
No email
send info
s/IPSec/IPsec/  x2

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-04-20)
No email
send info
The diff between this and 3281 is pretty simple. The deletion of this sentence (near the end of page 32 of 3281 update) sticks out on casual inspection: "In this case, the digestedObjectType MUST be publicKey and the otherObjectTypeID field MUST NOT be present." I wanted to shine the light on it to make sure its deletion was intentional.

Magnus Westerlund No Objection

(Russ Housley) Recuse