An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization
RFC 5755
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
s/IPSec/IPsec/ x2
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
The diff between this and 3281 is pretty simple. The deletion of this sentence (near the end of page 32 of 3281 update) sticks out on casual inspection: "In this case, the digestedObjectType MUST be publicKey and the otherObjectTypeID field MUST NOT be present." I wanted to shine the light on it to make sure its deletion was intentional.
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Recuse