An Internet Attribute Certificate Profile for Authorization
RFC 5755

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from pkix-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pkix-3281update@ietf.org to (None)
2013-07-24
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2010-01-25
05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-01-25
05 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5755' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-01-25
05 (System) RFC published
2009-07-27
05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2009-07-27
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2009-07-27
05 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2009-07-27
05 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2009-07-27
05 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2009-07-27
05 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2009-07-26
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2009-05-22
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-05-21
2009-05-14
05 Tim Polk Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-05-21 by Tim Polk
2009-04-28
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2009-04-27
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-27
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2009-04-27
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot comment]
2009-04-27
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Robert Sparks
2009-04-27
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-04-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-05.txt
2009-04-23
05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Cindy Morgan
2009-04-23
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot discuss]
I would like to talk about the document's normative reference to
RFC 3281 (yes, the same one that the document is also deprecating).
2009-04-23
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2009-04-23
05 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-04-23
05 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-04-22
05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-04-22
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-04-22
05 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2009-04-22
05 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2009-04-21
05 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
If I understand well the current rules and the latest interpretation given by the Legal Counsel of the IETF, the code in Appendix ...
2009-04-21
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-04-20
05 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
The diff between this and 3281 is pretty simple. The deletion of this sentence (near the end of page 32 of 3281 update) ...
2009-04-20
05 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
I don't think the following normative reference is stable enough:

[RFC3281-ERR] http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=302

1) The content behind that link can change significantly over time ...
2009-04-20
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-04-20
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2009-04-20
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-04-20
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-20
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-20
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
s/IPSec/IPsec/  x2
2009-04-20
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In general I think this is a well written document and I was planning to vote "Yes" originally.
Here are some other comments ...
2009-04-20
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
(Updated the DISCUSS portion)

4.2. Profile of Standard Fields

  GeneralName offers great flexibility.  To achieve interoperability,
  in spite of this flexibility, ...
2009-04-19
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In general I think this is a well written document and I was planning to vote "Yes" originally.
Here are some other comments ...
2009-04-19
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
In Appendix A Object Identifiers:

  This (normative) appendix lists the new object identifiers which are
  defined in this specification.  Some of ...
2009-04-19
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-15
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-04-15
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk
2009-04-15
05 Tim Polk Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk
2009-04-15
05 Tim Polk Created "Approve" ballot
2009-04-15
05 Tim Polk Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-04-23 by Tim Polk
2009-04-10
05 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-04-09
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Chris Lonvick.
2009-04-07
05 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand
this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-04-03
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Chris Lonvick
2009-04-03
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Chris Lonvick
2009-03-27
05 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2009-03-27
05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2009-03-27
05 Tim Polk Last Call was requested by Tim Polk
2009-03-27
05 Tim Polk State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk
2009-03-27
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-03-27
05 (System) Last call text was added
2009-03-27
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-03-26
05 Cindy Morgan
1.a - Steve Kent is the Shepherd. I have personally reviewed the
document and assert that it is ready for IESG publication.

1.b - The ...
2009-03-26
05 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2009-02-21
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-04.txt
2008-12-22
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-03.txt
2008-12-12
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-02.txt
2008-10-27
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-01.txt
2008-10-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-00.txt