IANA Guidelines for IPv4 Multicast Address Assignments
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.
(Ron Bonica) Yes
(Lars Eggert) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ross Callon) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection
Comment (2009-11-18 for -)
I agree that yearly review of assigned ranges by IANA is excessive. There's already a requirement for IANA to freeing up unrenewed registrations within 30 days. A single review of the registry triggered by this document, followed by that renewal/freeing process, ought to suffice for the next few years.
(Pasi Eronen) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
Comment (2009-11-16 for -)
Would be nice to include a "Changes from RFC 3171" section.
(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection
The Gen-ART Review by Miguel Garcia on 19-Oct-2009 included some suggestions: - Due to the nature of the draft, I think it makes sense to promote RFC 5226 to a normative reference. - Expand terms at the first occurrence. This includes: Section 1: SDP, SAP, GLOP, SSM Section 8: VMTP Section 9: ASN Section 9.2: RIR, AS, eGLOP - Section 9.2 contains two similar abbreviations: eGLOP and EGLOP. Those are probably the same and should be unified. - The document uses quite a few references to URLs. The RFC Editor does not like this approach because URLs often change with time. So, I would suggest to refer to the title of the web page instead. It might be possible that the RFC Editor accepts the addition of a reference to a URL (which should be valid for some time), but the main link should be done to the content, not to the URL. This includes: Section 1: http://www.iana.org/numbers.html This page is already obsolete, and the URL redirects to http://www.iana.org/protocols/; I suggest to refer to the "IANA Protocol Registries [IANA-protocols]", and the link is in the reference [IANA-protocols]. Section 11: http://www.iana.org/protocols/apply I suggest to refer to the "IANA Protocol Registration Forms [IANA-registration]", moving the link to the [IANA-registration] reference. - There is no reference to [SDR], used in Section 7. - Reference to RFC 1190 is obsolete. RFC 1819 should be used instead. - Reference to RFC 2030 is obsolete. RFC 4330 should be used instead.