A Set of Possible Requirements for a Future Routing Architecture
RFC 5772

Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The requirements for routing architectures described in this document were produced by two sub-groups under the IRTF Routing Research Group (RRG) in 2001, with some editorial updates up to 2006. The two sub- groups worked independently, and the resulting requirements represent two separate views of the problem and of what is required to fix the problem. This document may usefully serve as part of the recommended reading for anyone who works on routing architecture designs for the Internet in the future.

The document is published with the support of the IRTF RRG as a record of the work completed at that time, but with the understanding that it does not necessarily represent either the latest technical understanding or the technical consensus of the research group at the date of publication. This document defines a Historic Document for the Internet community.')

From: Aaron Falk


This is a request for the IESG to perform a RFC3932bis review of
draft-irtf-routing-reqs-10.txt [1] to be published an an Historical IRTF
RFC. The document has been approved for publication by the IRSG. See
below for details on prior reviews. Please copy all correspondence to
the document shepherd, Lixia Zhang .

--aaron

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-routing-reqs-10.txt

---
Aaron Falk
Chair
Internet Research Task Force
(617) 500-5960
http://www.irtf.org


Begin forwarded message:
> Aaron,
>
> this is a request to publish the following document as a historical RFC:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-irtf-routing-reqs-10.txt
>
> This document has gone through RRG review and IRSG review.
> Please see the issue tracker under ticket #16:
>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/16
> (somehow I could not change the version# from 09 to 10)
>
> Summary of review:
> - This document was a report on RRG activities around 2001-2002.
> It went through RRG reviews around that time.
> - The last round of RRG review was conducted in early 2007, and
> received no comments for changes.
> - IRSG members Jeremy Mineweaser and Juergen Schoenwaelder
> reviewed -08 version during IRSG Poll and provided valuable comments.
> After the authors addressed the comments in later revisions,
> both voted YES for the revision. No objection was received.
>
> I have updated the status to: IRSG review concluded.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Lixia Zhang
> Document Shepherd

also

>
>
> The requirements for routing architectures described in this document
> were produced by two sub-groups under the IRTF Routing Research Group
> in 2001, with some editorial updates up to 2006.
>
> Since this document summarizes discussions held sevenl years ago by
> members of the IRTF Routing Research Group (IRTF RRG) and other
> interested parties, it is published with the support of the IRTF RRG
> as a historical RFC to serve as a record of the work completed around
> 2001, and with the understanding that it does not necessarily
> represent either the latest technical understanding or the technical
> consensus of the research group at the date of publication.
>
> Lixia Zhang
>
> Document Shepherd