Considerations for Civic Addresses in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO): Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition
RFC 5774

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Cullen Jennings) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-07-01)
No email
send info
Section 6173, paragraph 36:
>    The element A5 holds the Katastralgemeindename (cadastral
>    municipality), the Katastralgemeindekennziffer (the identifier), or

  This is the only place where Katastralgemeindekennziffer appears in
  the document - do you mean Katastralgemeindenummer?

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-06-30)
No email
send info
Updated to add a forgotten comment...

from section 1:

   For some countries Section 3.4 of [RFC4776] already contains
   considerations on the use of administrative sub-division elements.
   It's important to note that those examples are outdated, because RFC
   5139 [RFC5139] disallows the use of the 'A6' elements for street

I suggest that this document register these examples in the new IANA registry
as "obsolete" for completeness.

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection