Considerations for Civic Addresses in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO): Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition
RFC 5774

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection

Section 6173, paragraph 36:
>    The element A5 holds the Katastralgemeindename (cadastral
>    municipality), the Katastralgemeindekennziffer (the identifier), or

  This is the only place where Katastralgemeindekennziffer appears in
  the document - do you mean Katastralgemeindenummer?

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) Yes

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

Updated to add a forgotten comment...

from section 1:

   For some countries Section 3.4 of [RFC4776] already contains
   considerations on the use of administrative sub-division elements.
   It's important to note that those examples are outdated, because RFC
   5139 [RFC5139] disallows the use of the 'A6' elements for street
   names.

I suggest that this document register these examples in the new IANA registry
as "obsolete" for completeness.