Skip to main content

PA-TNC: A Posture Attribute (PA) Protocol Compatible with Trusted Network Connect (TNC)
RFC 5792

Yes

(Tim Polk)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Adrian Farrel)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)

No Record

(Magnus Westerlund)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert
(was Discuss) No Objection
Tim Polk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2009-10-25)
Who is going to be the Designated Expert for the registries created by the document?
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2009-09-17)
In the last paragraph of section 3.1, a reference to section 4.5 of the PB spec would be helpful, as section 3.4 of the PB spec really describes very little of the PB-PA header.

Similarly, a reference to section 4.5 of the PB spec in section 3.3 would be helpful.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2009-07-15)
I strongly agree with Alexey's comment suggesting more discussion of the 
danger of automatic processing of the content of Remediation instructions.

Should the document provide some guidance on what to do if a message contains both a numeric version and a string version (4.2.3, 4.2.4 respectively)

draft-sangster-nea-pa-tnc-security-00 is expired. What is the nea wg's current plan for it?
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was No Objection) No Record
No Record ()