The RObust Header Compression (ROHC) Framework
RFC 5795

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Magnus Westerlund Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Pasi Eronen) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) (was Abstain) No Objection

Comment (2009-12-17 for -)
No email
send info
The implementation and update rate of 4995 has not been exactly stelar. Replacing it with a new RFC is likely to make this worse. This fixes one tiny bug in the spec - I think it would be much better to do this with an errata particularly since many implementation if not all did the right thing in the implementation (vs what bug in spec said)

(Alexey Melnikov) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2009-12-13)
No email
send info
Please address (or at least reply to) SecDir comments by Stephen Hanna.

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection