Authentication and Confidentiality in Protocol Independent Multicast Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) Link-Local Messages
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
( Adrian Farrel ) Yes
Jari Arkko (was Discuss) No Objection
( Ron Bonica ) No Objection
( Ross Callon ) No Objection
( Ralph Droms ) No Objection
( Lisa Dusseault ) No Objection
( Russ Housley ) No Objection
( Cullen Jennings ) No Objection
( Alexey Melnikov ) No Objection
Comment (2009-11-28 for -)
4. Authentication Implementations conforming to this specification MUST support authentication for PIM-SM link-local messages. Implementations conforming to this specification MUST support HMAC-SHA1. A reference to the document that defines authentication using HMAC-SHA1 would be very helpful here. And BTW, did you mean HMAC-SHA1-96 mentioned in RFC 4835? 5. Confidentiality Implementations conforming to this specification SHOULD support confidentiality for PIM-SM. Implementations supporting confidentiality MUST support AES-CBC with a 128-bit key. As above.