Framework for Metric Composition
RFC 5835
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert Yes
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
Thank you for a readble document. I spotted a few nits along the way. If you are working on the document, you might fix then to save the RFC Editor some effort. Abstract s/This new framework memo/This framework/ In five years the framewrok will not be new! --- 1.1.2 Network managers and maintenance forces prefer to see results presented very rapidly, to detect problems quickly or see if their action has corrected a problem. I stumbled reading "forces" verb or noun. Suggest Network managers and maintainers prefer to see results presented very rapidly, to detect problems quickly or see if their action has corrected a problem. --- 1.1.3 s/it may not to be reasonable/it may not be reasonable/ --- 2. s/[RFC2330]as/[RFC2330] as/ --- 5.1 s/are encumbered/is encumbered/
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) (was No Record, No Objection) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection