datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.4.0, 2014-04-22
Report a bug

DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment, and Operations
RFC 5863

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2010-06-01 RFC Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-01 RFC Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5863' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-27 RFC (System) RFC published
2010-03-12 11 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-03-12 11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-03-12 11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-12 11 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-03-12 11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-03-12 11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-03-12 11 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Amy Vezza
2010-03-11 11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-03-11 11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-02-22 11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(a) the last sentence before Figure 2 (section 2.5) seems to be missing a closing thought
(and closing punctuation):

"... but also contacting ...[show all]
2010-02-22 11 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[This is a revised discuss, reflecting the open issues that I believe merit a brief discussion in
the document.]

Charlie Kaufman noted a ...[show all]
2010-02-05 11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-02-04
2010-02-04 11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-04 11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
the last sentence before Figure 2 (section 2.5) seems to be missing a closing thought
(and closing punctuation):

"... but also contacting the ...[show all]
2010-02-04 11 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[Moved from discuss-discuss to a "real" discuss based on the call...]

Charlie Kaufman noted a number of open issues in his secdir review ...[show all]
2010-02-04 11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's discuss
2010-02-04 11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's discuss
2010-02-04 11 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2010-02-04 11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
the last sentence before Figure 2 (section 2.5) seems to be missing a closing thought
(and closing punctuation):

"... but also contacting the ...[show all]
2010-02-04 11 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss

Charlie Kaufman noted a number of open issues in his secdir review; Dave C's response was
generally "we ...[show all]
2010-02-04 11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Tim Polk
2010-02-04 11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-02-04 11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-02-04 11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-02-03 11 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2010-02-03 11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
the last sentence before Figure 2 (section 2.5) seems to be missing a closing thought
(and closing punctuation):

"... but also contacting the ...[show all]
2010-02-03 11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-02-03 11 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-02-03 11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2010-02-03 11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-02-02 11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-02-02 11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-01-29 11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-01-28 11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot comment]
Section 2.2, 3rd paragraph, is quoted from RFC 5672, but the
quotation isn't word-by-word exact.
2010-01-28 11 Pasi Eronen Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-02-04 by Pasi Eronen
2010-01-28 11 Pasi Eronen State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Pasi Eronen
2010-01-28 11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pasi Eronen
2010-01-28 11 Pasi Eronen Ballot has been issued by Pasi Eronen
2010-01-28 11 Pasi Eronen Created "Approve" ballot
2010-01-27 11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-01-27 11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-11.txt (diff from previous)
2010-01-26 10 Pasi Eronen State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Pasi Eronen
2009-12-17 10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-12-17 10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-10.txt (diff from previous)
2009-12-16 09 Pasi Eronen State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Pasi Eronen
2009-12-16 09 Pasi Eronen
Last call summary for draft-ietf-dkim-deployment

The IETF Last Call for dkim-deployment ended on Monday.  According
to my notes, we got the following comments:

http://mipassoc ...[show all]
2009-12-14 09 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-12-11 09 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-11-30 09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2009-11-30 09 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-11-30 09 Pasi Eronen State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-30 09 Pasi Eronen Last Call was requested by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-30 09 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-11-30 09 (System) Last call text was added
2009-11-30 09 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-11-30 09 Pasi Eronen State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Pasi Eronen
2009-11-30 09 Pasi Eronen Note field has been cleared by Pasi Eronen
2009-10-27 09 Pasi Eronen
The DKIM Working Group requests the publication of
draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-09 as an Informational RFC.

  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the ...[show all]
2009-10-27 09 Pasi Eronen Draft Added by Pasi Eronen in state Publication Requested
2009-10-26 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-09.txt (diff from previous)
2009-08-25 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-08.txt (diff from previous)
2009-07-11 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-07.txt (diff from previous)
2009-07-11 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-06.txt (diff from previous)
2009-06-03 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-05.txt (diff from previous)
2009-03-09 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-04.txt (diff from previous)
2009-02-09 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-03.txt (diff from previous)
2008-11-03 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-02.txt (diff from previous)
2008-08-28 01 (System) Document has expired
2008-02-25 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-01.txt (diff from previous)
2007-11-12 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-00.txt