DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS
RFC 5864

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Alexey Melnikov Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2010-02-16 for -)
No email
send info
Section 4., paragraph 8:
>        _<service>._<proto>.<name>
>    <name> MUST be the AFS cell name for which the identified server
>    provides AFS services.

  Are AFS cell names required to be valid domain names?

(Pasi Eronen) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2010-02-18 for -)
No email
send info
Updated comment after discussion with authors

I support Tim's Discuss and note further that RFC 1183 (which predates 
the different classifications of RFCs) says...

   This memo defines five new DNS types for experimental purposes.  This
   RFC describes an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community,
   and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) (was Discuss) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection