IPv6 Subnet Model: The Relationship between Links and Subnet Prefixes
RFC 5942

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
12 (System) Notify list changed from 6man-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
12 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
12 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
12 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2010-07-19
12 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-07-19
12 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5942' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-07-16
12 (System) RFC published
2010-05-05
12 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2010-05-05
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-05-05
12 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-05-05
12 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-05-05
12 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-05-05
12 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-05-05
12 Jari Arkko Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-05-06 by Jari Arkko
2010-05-05
12 Jari Arkko State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::External Party by Jari Arkko
2010-05-05
12 Jari Arkko Taken off the agenda as there is now enough votes.
2010-05-05
12 Jari Arkko [Note]: 'Brian Haberman (brian@innovationslab.net) is the document shepherd.' added by Jari Arkko
2010-05-03
12 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-04-27
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-12.txt
2010-04-26
12 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ron Bonica
2010-04-26
12 Jari Arkko Asking Ron to clear his discuss.
2010-04-22
12 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I still find the description of the example in section 5 unclear.  The syntax in this passage is tortured:

  An address ...
2010-04-21
12 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2010-04-21
12 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::External Party from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-04-21
12 Jari Arkko Waiting on Lars and Ralph to take a new look.
2010-04-20
12 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-04-20
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-11.txt
2010-04-19
12 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-05-06 by Jari Arkko
2010-04-19
12 Jari Arkko
[Note]: 'On the agenda on May 6th to search for 1 additional vote
Brian Haberman (brian@innovationslab.net) is the document shepherd.' added by Jari ...
2010-04-19
12 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-04-02
12 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I still find the example in section 5 confusing.  It would be better to simply state the observer behavior, which is (I ...
2010-04-02
12 Ralph Droms [Ballot discuss]
2010-04-02
12 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ralph Droms
2010-03-25
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-10.txt
2010-03-11
12 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-11
12 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2010-03-11
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-09.txt
2010-03-11
12 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2010-03-11
12 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
I concur with Ralph's DISCUSS. There is very little new in this document. Maybe the issues is best handled with an errata ...
2010-03-11
12 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-03-11
12 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-03-11
12 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Amy Vezza
2010-03-11
12 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2010-03-11
12 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-03-10
12 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2010-03-10
12 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2010-03-10
12 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Gen-ART Review by Pete McCann on 2010-03-09 included some
  editorial comments.  Please consider them if an update to this
  ...
2010-03-10
12 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-03-10
12 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
I support Lars' DISCUSS about the need to include mandatory 2119 boilerplate.
2010-03-10
12 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
This is a DISCUSS DISCUSS, which I believe needs clarification before I can approve this document. Some of the requirements in sections 3 ...
2010-03-10
12 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-03-10
12 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-03-10
12 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2010-03-10
12 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
This document needs a terminology section to define or point to the intended definition of "subnet" and various terms from RFC 4291, et ...
2010-03-10
12 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Regrettably, I'm having some trouble with access to the datatracker today, and my original DISCUSS text was lost.  Retyping...

I'm ...
2010-03-10
12 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
This document needs a terminology section to define or point to the intended definition of "subnet" and various terms from RFC 4291, et ...
2010-03-10
12 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
From list item 3 of section 2:

      Neither of these tests are acceptable definitions for an address
      ...
2010-03-10
12 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-03-09
12 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4., paragraph 0:
>    4.  Implementations compliant with [RFC4861] MUST adhere to the

  DISCUSS: The document seems to lack ...
2010-03-09
12 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-03-08
12 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-03-06
12 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-03-05
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-08.txt
2010-03-03
12 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2010-03-03
12 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Eric Rescorla
2010-02-25
12 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-02-25
12 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-25
12 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-03-11 by Jari Arkko
2010-02-25
12 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested by Jari Arkko
2010-02-25
12 Jari Arkko State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed by Jari Arkko
2010-02-25
12 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2010-02-25
12 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2010-02-25
12 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2010-02-25
12 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-02-25
12 (System) Last call text was added
2010-02-25
12 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-02-19
12 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested by Jari Arkko
2010-02-19
12 Jari Arkko
I have reviewed this draft. The draft is in good shape and a welcome clarification. However, I had two small issues I wanted to talk ...
2010-02-05
12 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Brian Haberman (brian@innovationslab.net) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-05
12 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does ...
2010-02-05
12 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2009-12-23
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-07.txt
2009-11-14
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-06.txt
2009-05-15
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-05.txt
2009-05-07
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-04.txt
2009-03-06
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-03.txt
2008-10-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-02.txt
2008-07-10
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-01.txt
2008-05-08
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-subnet-model-00.txt