Network Management Requirements for MPLS-based Transport Networks
RFC 5951
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection
Section 7., paragraph 0: > 7. Performance Management Requirements Should this section refer to IETF or ITU-T metrics or is it OK to leave this open?
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
In the second paragraph of section 2 - the capitalization of the keywords is inconsistent.
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
In section 2 I strongly recommend to used the conbination NETCONF/YANG as an example rather anything else. But Dan holds that point as part of his DISCUSS.
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection