A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
RFC 5952

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from 6man-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2010-08-20
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5952' added by Amy Vezza
2010-08-20
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-08-20
07 (System) RFC published
2010-04-22
07 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-22
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-04-22
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-04-22
07 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-04-22
07 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-04-22
07 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-04-22
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::External Party by Jari Arkko
2010-04-22
07 Jari Arkko
Gonzalo indicates that he does not want to take Cullen's Discuss.
In any case, I think Cullen's Discuss was addressed in the new ...
2010-04-21
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ralph Droms
2010-04-19
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2010-04-19
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2010-04-18
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::External Party from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-04-18
07 Jari Arkko
Waiting for other ADs to determine if they are happy with the new revision. I have reviewed the new version and the discussion, and the ...
2010-04-09
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ron Bonica
2010-02-25
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-07.txt
2010-02-19
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2010-02-19
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-06.txt
2010-02-17
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-02-17
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-02-16
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-02-16
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-05.txt
2010-02-05
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-02-04
2010-02-04
07 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-04
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
2010-02-04
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
I'd like to reread the next version of this document.
2010-02-04
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
DISCUSS

I would be happy to change my DISCUSS to a YES if the following changes are made:

DOCUMENT STATUS

As far as ...
2010-02-04
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-02-04
07 Magnus Westerlund
[Ballot comment]
I am supporting Lars and Ralphs discusses.

I think specifying a true canonical form at PS level is a good thing. However, the ...
2010-02-04
07 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2010-02-04
07 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. If the recommendations in the document apply to prefixes and not only to addresses as section 7 seems to indicate this needs ...
2010-02-04
07 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Part of the issues were brought-up by OPS-DIR reviewer David Kessens.

1. The intended PS status does not fit the content of the ...
2010-02-04
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-02-03
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
This document is likely not very useful as a Proposed Standard in its current form.  It needs to be either prescriptive, providing ...
2010-02-03
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-02-03
07 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
I would prefer to see a single unambiguous representation for display, although I acknowledge
that may be difficult to achieve consensus.
2010-02-03
07 Tim Polk [Ballot discuss]
This feels like a BCP to me, rather than a standards track RFC.
2010-02-03
07 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
I would prefer to see a single unambiguous representation for display, although I acknowledge
that may be difficult to achieve consensus.
2010-02-03
07 Tim Polk [Ballot discuss]
This feels like a BCP to me, rather than a standards track RFC.
2010-02-03
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-02-03
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Jari Arkko
2010-02-02
07 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Support Lars' discuss

In section 4.2.3, these two sentences are particularly hard to parse:
  "One idea to avoid any confusion ...
2010-02-02
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-02-02
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot comment]
I think  [2001:db8::1]:80 should be the preferred form for ports.
2010-02-02
07 Cullen Jennings
[Ballot discuss]
I agree a canonical forma is needed for all the reasons provided. But this does not provide one. Is there any good reasons ...
2010-02-02
07 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2010-02-02
07 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
I support the DISCUSS position posted by Lars.
2010-02-02
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-02-02
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Language & grammar are rough.

Section 3 is trivial and much too long. Suggest to summarize into 1-2 paragraphs and move the long ...
2010-02-02
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
The problem that this document tries to address is in short: "RFC4291 allows one IPv6 address to be represented by several text strings ...
2010-02-02
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-02-01
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Section 1

I found the Introduction rather terse. I suggest reproducing some of
the text from the Abstract.

The section would benefit from ...
2010-02-01
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
Useful work. Thanks.
Just a couple of points I would like to Discuss before recommending publication of this document.

It is not clear ...
2010-02-01
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-01-31
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tom Yu.
2010-01-29
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-01-26
07 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2010-01-26
07 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document
to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-01-21
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2010-01-21
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tom Yu
2010-01-16
07 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-01-15
07 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-02-04 by Jari Arkko
2010-01-15
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-01-15
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-01-15
07 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested by Jari Arkko
2010-01-15
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-01-15
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2010-01-15
07 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2010-01-15
07 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2010-01-15
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-01-15
07 (System) Last call text was added
2010-01-15
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-01-14
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-01-14
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-04.txt
2009-12-25
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Jari Arkko
2009-12-25
07 Jari Arkko
I have reviewed this draft.

Overall, this is a long overdue change and I want to move forward with this document. There were a couple ...
2009-12-24
07 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jari Arkko
2009-12-24
07 Jari Arkko
Advancement Questionnaire for <draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-03.txt>

> > (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
> >      Document Shepherd ...
2009-12-21
07 Jari Arkko Draft Added by Jari Arkko in state Publication Requested
2009-11-25
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-03.txt
2009-11-10
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-02.txt
2009-10-21
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-01.txt
2009-08-24
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-00.txt