An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports
RFC 5965

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from marf-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-marf-base@ietf.org, ietf@cybernothing.org to ietf@cybernothing.org
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2010-08-31
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-31
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 5965' by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-30
06 (System) RFC published
2010-05-27
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-05-27
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-05-27
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-05-27
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-05-24
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-24
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-05-24
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-05-24
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-05-24
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-05-21
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-marf-base-06.txt
2010-05-21
06 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-05-20
2010-05-20
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-20
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-05-20
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-05-20
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-05-20
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-05-20
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-05-20
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-05-20
06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-05-19
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Harrington
2010-05-19
06 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS.

in sectio 3.2, last paragraph, the historic field should also be accepted - why, if it is historic ...
2010-05-19
06 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
2010-05-19
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The introduction says:
  >
  > This memo seeks to define a standard extensible format by creating
  > the "message/feedback-report ...
2010-05-19
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-05-19
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-05-19
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-05-19
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-05-19
06 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-19
06 Alexey Melnikov [Note]: 'J.D. Falk <ietf@cybernothing.org> is the document shepherd.
' added by Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-18
06 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS.

in sectio 3.2, last paragraph, the historic field should also be accepted - why, if it is historic ...
2010-05-18
06 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
in section 4, there is no requirement as to envelope sender. How will this impact interoperability? Th ewhol epurpose of this document is ...
2010-05-18
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by David Harrington
2010-05-18
06 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS.

in sectio 3.2, last paragraph, the historic field should also be accepted - why, if it is historic ...
2010-05-18
06 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-05-18
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
Cleared.
2010-05-18
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot discuss]
2010-05-18
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-05-18
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-marf-base-05.txt
2010-05-18
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS positions.
2010-05-18
06 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
1. The security considerations probably need to note that the "User-Agent" field is merely asserted and cannot be relied upon (e.g., it ...
2010-05-18
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-05-18
06 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Tim's DISCUSS positions.
2010-05-18
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-05-18
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
It would be helpful (IMHO, anyway) if section 3 included a forward pointer to section 5 (extensibility).    The content of section ...
2010-05-18
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This discuss has three parts:  The first issue is actionable, the second and third are intended as
a discuss-discuss.

(1) This document ...
2010-05-18
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
It would be helpful (IMHO, anyway) if section 3 included a forward pointer to section 5 (extensibility).    The content of section ...
2010-05-18
06 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This discuss has two parts:  The first issue is actionable, the second is intended as a discuss-discuss.

(1) This document is conspicuously ...
2010-05-18
06 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-05-14
06 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-05-10
06 Amanda Baber
IANA comments:

Upon approval of this document, IANA will perform the following actions:

ACTION 1:

make the following assignment in the "Message Media Types" registry ...
2010-05-07
06 Alexey Melnikov [Note]: 'J.D. Falk <ietf@cybernothing.org> is the document shepherd.
This document needs a quick update after IETF LC.' added by Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-07
06 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-07
06 Alexey Melnikov Ballot has been issued by Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-07
06 Alexey Melnikov Created "Approve" ballot
2010-05-07
06 Alexey Melnikov Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-05-20 by Alexey Melnikov
2010-05-03
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland
2010-04-30
06 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-04-30
06 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-04-30
06 Alexey Melnikov Last Call was requested by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-30
06 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-30
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-04-30
06 (System) Last call text was added
2010-04-30
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-04-30
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-04-30
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-marf-base-04.txt
2010-04-24
06 Alexey Melnikov
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2010-04-24
06 Alexey Melnikov
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2010-04-24
06 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-24
06 Alexey Melnikov
State Change Notice email list have been change to marf-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-marf-base@tools.ietf.org, ietf@cybernothing.org from marf-chairs@tools.ietf.org ...
2010-04-24
06 Alexey Melnikov [Note]: 'J.D. Falk <ietf@cybernothing.org> is the document shepherd' added by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-24
06 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Alexey Melnikov
2010-04-21
06 Alexey Melnikov Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-shafranovich-feedback-report.
2010-04-21
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-marf-base-03.txt
2010-04-06
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-marf-base-02.txt
2010-02-23
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-marf-base-01.txt
2010-01-27
06 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-shafranovich-feedback-report.
2010-01-27
06 (System) Draft Added by the IESG Secretary in state 0.  by system
2010-01-26
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-marf-base-00.txt