NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP) for Quality-of-Service Signaling
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.
(Magnus Westerlund) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Ross Callon) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings) No Objection
(Tim Polk) No Objection
Comment (2010-01-21 for -)
One note: As an experimental RFC, I was very impressed by the thought put into the security considerations. Reviewing the security implications of different models is really helpful to the reader. However, if this document was being considered for standards track, I would have asked for text describing which GIST features were required to meet the various security considerations. To be clear, I am not asking for any changes. I just want to avoid unwelcome surprises in the case of a successful experiment and resubmission for standards track.