NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP) for Quality-of-Service Signaling
RFC 5974

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.

(Magnus Westerlund) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

Comment (2010-01-21 for -)
No email
send info
One note: As an experimental RFC, I was very impressed by the thought put into the security
considerations.  Reviewing the security implications of different models is really helpful to the
reader.  However, if this document was being considered for standards track, I would have asked
for text describing which GIST features were required to meet the various security
considerations.

To be clear, I am not asking for any changes. I just want to avoid unwelcome surprises in the
case of a successful experiment and resubmission for standards track.

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection