NSIS Operation over IP Tunnels
RFC 5979

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.

(Lars Eggert) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2010-07-15 for -)
No email
send info
Section 3.1

   The following definition of IP tunneling is derived from [RFC2473]
   and adapted for both IPv4 and IPv6.

This is a bit odd given the existence of RFC 1853.

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2010-06-28 for -)
No email
send info
  Pleae consider the editorial comments from the Gen-ART Review by
  Francis Dupont on 2010-06-15.  The review can be found at:

    http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/
    draft-ietf-nsis-tunnel-11-dupont.txt

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

Comment (2010-06-28 for -)
No email
send info
It appears that the following references might be normative, not informative: [RFC4080], [RFC2473], [RFC2113], [RFC2711], [RFC2746], [RFC3697], [RFC4081]. Please consult http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/normative-informative.html for guidelines regarding the difference between normative and informative references, and consider whether some of the foregoing references would best be changed to normative.

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection