Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) (was Discuss) Yes
(Lisa Dusseault) Yes
Alexey Melnikov Yes
(Peter Saint-Andre) (was Discuss) Yes
Comment (2010-04-30 for -)
I am now satisfied that the "hub" relation will be more clearly defined in the next version of the PubsubHubbub specification, although I agree that the pointer from the registry should be to the specification itself, not the general website for the project.
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) (was Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2010-04-20 for -)
[TBD]@ietf.org and [TBD-2]@ietf.org mailing lists need to be created and an RFC Editor Note needs to ask them to substitute the final names.
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Tim Polk) (was No Record, Discuss) No Objection
Comment (2010-04-22 for -)
The document has a novel approach to expert review, with expiration of a timer failing over to the IESG. Within at most 14 days of the request, the Designated Expert(s) will either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this decision to the review list. Denials should include an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the request successful. Registration requests that are undetermined for a period longer than 21 days can be brought to the IESG's attention (using the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list) for resolution. Vanilla expert review would be better...