Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Data Channel Switching Capable (DCSC) and Channel Set Label Extensions
RFC 6002
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
3.1. Generalized Channel_Set LABEL_REQUEST Object The Generalized Channel_Set LABEL_REQUEST object is used to indicate that the Generalized Channel_Set LABEL Object is to be used with the associated LSP. The format of the Generalized Channel_Set LABEL_REQUEST object is the same as the Generalized LABEL_REQUEST object But Section 3.2 says that it is "based on" the latter? and uses a C-Type of TBA. 3.2. Generalized Channel_Set LABEL Object The Channel_Set Sub-Object size is measured in bytes and MUST always be a multiple of 4, and at least 4, and has the following format: Question: how can one determine size of a Channel_Set Sub-Object?
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
Nevil Brownlee made the following comment in his OPS-DIR review: 'The text: section 3.3 says: "As such the formats of the other label related objects are also impacted." It doesn't say anything about how they'd be impacted, and it's not obvious to me why there should be any such impact. Maybe a few words to clarify that would be useful?' I believe that Nevil is correct and the impact on the format of other label related objects is unclear.
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection