Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) Support for Metro Ethernet Forum and G.8011 User Network Interface (UNI)
RFC 6005
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection
A few editorial comments: section 4, first sentence says there is one additonal requirement. Is that what is described in 4.1? The text doesn't explciitly state what the additional requirement is. It might be good to add to the first sentence ",as described in section 4.1." s/one additional ... requirements/one additional ... requirement/ s/takes occurs/occurs/ or s/takes occurs/takes place/ idnits raises some issues that should be resolved.
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
In section 6, it is hard to parse: "information that takes occurs per Section 7.2 of [RFC4974]."
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection