IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators
RFC 6052
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(David Harrington; former steering group member) Yes
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
All BEHAVE documents should be updated to use lowercased hex digits (as per Section 4.3 of draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation) in example addresses.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
Minor comment ... the name "Well Known Prefix" seems underspecified; however, I can't suggest something terse that seems better. Maybe "Well Known 64xlate Prefix"?
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection
The PL row in Figure 1 includes superfluous lengths 112 and 120 bits. I would suggest:
OLD
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|PL| 0-------------32--40--48--56--64--72--80--88--96--104-112-120-|
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
NEW
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
|PL| 0-------------32--40--48--56--64--72--80--88--96--104----------|
+--+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
(2)
In the paragraph following figure 1:
s/prefic is 96 bits/prefix is 96 bits/