Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the National Emergency Number Association (NENA)
RFC 6061
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
Section 1., paragraph 1: > NENA is the "Voice of 9-1-1" in North America. NENA's mission is to > foster the technological advancement, availability and implementation > of a universal emergency telephone number system (9-1-1). In > carrying out its mission, NENA promotes research, planning, training > and education. The protection of human life, the preservation of > property, and the maintenance of general community security are among > NENA's objectives. NENA serves as a link in the delivery of > emergency services. 9-1-1 has, throughout its evolution, become > recognized as an asset of the North American public. I feel like I am reading an advertisement for NENA here...
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
You have to love it when people have nothing better to do than pick trivial nits :-) Abstract... "URN name model" Should that be "URN model"? --- Abstract... Management activities for these and other resource types are provided by the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) Registry System (NRS). You have already defined "NENA" so... Management activities for these and other resource types are provided by the NENA Registry System (NRS). --- Introduction... Should expand "NENA" on first usage. --- Section 2... TNRS will maintain a website at a stable address which provides XML and text renderings of the urn:nena registry. Is this a typo? s/TNRS/NRS/ ?
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
[NENA08-003] reference might be Normative.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
Like Lars, I was bothered a bit by some of the style in the Introduction section. Not quite RFC style, IMHO.
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Please consider the comments made by Suresh Krishnan in the Gen-ART
Review posted on 31 August 2010. The review can be found here:
http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/
draft-rosen-urn-nena-02-krishnan.txt
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
1) Just nit picking here, but in the 1st paragraph of the introduction it says that NENA's mission is .... universal .... but then it's goes on to say it's just for N.A. Is NENA really shooting for universal 9-1-1 or just in N.A.? 2) RFC 2141 requires US-ASCII so you could change: The "NENAclass" is a US-ASCII string that conforms to the URN syntax ... to The "NENAclass" conforms to the URN syntax ...
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection