Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions
RFC 6066
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
I am agreeing with Peter's DISCUSS.
Additionally, I have the following comments:
10.1 pkipath MIME Type Registration
The "Encoding Considerations" section should say that the data is binary.
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Magnus Nystrom <magnus@rsasecurity.com>
I vaguely remember that Magnus has changed jobs since, so this email address is no longer valid.
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) (was Discuss, Yes) Yes
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Thanks for addressng my Discuss and Comment. I have Cleared.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
== Unused Reference: 'RFC2119' is defined on line 1027, but no explicit reference was found in the text -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 2246 (Obsoleted by RFC 4346) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4346 (Obsoleted by RFC 5246) -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4366 (Obsoleted by RFC 5246)
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection