Making TCP More Robust to Long Connectivity Disruptions (TCP-LCD)
RFC 6069

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2010-08-26 for -)
No email
send info
Thank you for this work and for proposing it as Experimental.

My first Comment is very close to being a Discuss, and I hope you
feel able to add some text (perhaps to the Introduction) to give
the reader (and future generations) some guidance.

For experimental documents, I think it is important to give some
parameters of the nature of the experiment. 
- What constraints will be placed on the experimental work to prevent
  the experiment spilling out into the Internet (walled garden)?
- What are the risks if the experiment is released?
  (perhaps a forward pointer to section 7)
- How will you judge whether the work is stable and successful?
- Do you have plans / proposals to return and revise the work for
  the Standards Track?

---

Section 2

Tiny nit, sorry

   This document improves TCP's behavior in case of "long connectivity
   disruptions".

Well, the document doesn't do that of itself :-)

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2010-08-26 for -)
No email
send info
  Please consider the editorial comments in the Gen-ART Review from
  Enrico Marocco on 25-Aug-2010.

(Tim Polk) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) (was Discuss) No Objection